Clint Westbrook

Bump, for some reason this was left ignored although clearly other apps were checked?

This is true.

User was initially banned for requesting due to mental health issues but he threatened MRDM I wouldn't be able to just unban him that easily so therefore he had to make an app.

+1 As I think you have changed

???

You were banned for ARDM + MRDM in a sit.

+1

actually a good suggestion. though don't remove drones, cale events become more poggier with them, keep drones

+1

already stated by xunt and norra

7 hours ago, Noe said:

+1

Can only follow @Clint Westbrook's assessment even though he is talking about multiple people??

"I have seen them on the server"

Oh, In English you can use "them" when talking about another person  if you are talking about them directly.

+1.

From my experiences this user is very mature. 

I have seen them on the server before and the only sit I've ever had with them was during a misunderstanding.

Seems to know the rules to their full required extent.

Is a generally positive and humble user.

I would love to see you in the staff team.

Name : Clint Westbrook

Rank : SCP-RP Administrator 

Proof : 

i dont remember banning an alfy

My favourite Star Wars character is Darth Maul

(forgot how to spell name)

Honestly. From my experiences with you, you are a really cool person.

The app is actually well made, but If I were you I elaborate more on the "What is SCP-RP about" section. But it's whether you want to or not.

From me it is a +1 and I hope if you get accepted you will stay with us long term.

+1,

Now, 20 hours of play-time and already 2 warns?

I have never seen you play on the server to be completely honest. 

2 hours ago, Puggo19 said:

@Atomik ^

Me when micromanaging a group he no longer owns

+1.

When I used to play this server in V5 and such I enjoyed the presence of Mazy, I am not sure what has changed which lead up to his ban, but I want him to receive another chance. Although his last appeal was pretty braindead, I think since he seems reasonably apologetic he should be unbanned.

+1 

very good rp men,

but onlly problem is is the app

im gonna +1 anyway because i wanna give you a chance

good luck

3 minutes ago, хле6 NOI said:

I just realized, if you take in all the screenshot in consideration, it's clear that the commander and the scientiest were lined up behind the guy i shot in self defense. It's absolutely CROSSFIRE i was referring to someone with a sniper rifle, not the commander.

My POV i just shot and killed 2 with a single crossfire, the logs you gave show me clearly crossfiring 2 other people that were LITERALLY lined up, it's clear as day in the screenshots

Even if any of it was crossfire you still only crossfired 1 person.

The last picture was the last guy you shot (at the bottom) It was after you killed everyone. That means you still did RDMX2, shot a an MTF and ended up in killing the researcher, then randomly shot another MTF in the back, hello?

If I take into consideration the D-class and the researcher then it will be ARDM X2 and RDMX2 which is still a ban for 2 days?

Just now, хле6 NOI said:

Goring is the scientist, the 2nd "RDM" i guess, the admin isn't being very clear of who did i RDM and why.

I just want a neat, clean list saying

1st RDM (Name) (Reason)

2nd RDM (Name) (Reason)

3rd RDM (Name) (Reason)

check the screenshots 

2 minutes ago, fairgamer said:

I mean you cant first request for the logs to be checked,and when the logs say "You rdm'd 3 people" You say " well the logs are wrong"

 

why are you confused at what i said doe

I'll apologise if I turn out to be in the wrong.

But in my eyes I currently am not, if I am then I will apologise like I've said.

What???

I clearly explained what happened and you can clearly see the screenshots I sent???

The 049 and D-Class kill are not involved in the warn?????????

You began the combat first, no one shot you first????????

No. I banned him after Viktor because I have a different way of punishing which goes by the TMod Punishment Guide (atleast I remember thats where its from, or I think I was told by a Senior Staff or Security-Staff when I was still a Trial Mod), although I am not a TMod, It teaches you how punishments work and explains that even if it's attempted, you still tried to do it therefore it's rdm. You did RDMX3 not RDMX2, attempted RDM also classifies are RDM since there is no such this as "Attempted RDM". You did RDM X3. What you did was you shot at a Class D in crossfire yes, then a guy took out his cuffs and you immediately resulted in shooting him, when you shot him you went on a rampage and killed 1 other person and nearly killed another guy, notice, all of those combats were literally started by you, no one else. You torched everyone, so you are basically lying on your application.

Do you see how far away one of them was? And do you see how you torched then all up yourself? In my opinion due to your blatant lying on this app the ban should be extended. But this is for SMT to decide.

Now let me explain the sit from my POV  :

I get told you RDMed, I check logs and surprise surprise! Multiple death people including a cuffed Class-D, I then assume you MassRDMed, then you explained how the Class-D was killed in cross-fire, I acknowledge this and apologise due to the fact that it was crossfire, so It's no longer RDM X4, but instead RDM X3, I then explain to you that you RDMed x3 people I said and I quote "You shot 3 people, 2 of which were killed, and 1 was damaged". You then decided to be ignorant and deny anything I said, Yes I did mistake someone's job cause it turns out they changed right after they were killed. I then double checked the log and they were E-11 before they died and then changed after which I apologised for because it was an honest and small mistake, but it still doesn't justify your RDM X3? Does it? The sit took so long because you were ignorant and decided not to listen, I told you that you shot 3 people and killed 2 but you denied it and only say "I only shot 049 and that guy in cuffs" then when I said, no, you killed 2 people + 1 injured 1 you decided to say "Nonono check logs!" which I did and it clearly still said you shot 3 people 2 of which died. You were clearly lying. 

I wasn't the one who banned you at first. Another Admin banned you which wasn't mean, I just added a reason. The admin didn't come to check why you killed them. But even if he came to check it was still a lot of invalid shots and kills.

I am not at all biased dude,

@Viktor Svetsken

Huge +1,

If you kill someone not obeying FearRP its completely fine, they should have been warned not you.

Imagine not listening to both players side and waiting for evidence and if there is no evidence then the sit is dismissed.

smh....

(That is if the story is true)

Just now, ✪Kanser CS.MONEY said:

The only Time I was Afk there was an Online lesson and I was 096

and doea