Biergerstein

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Biergerstein

  1. Neutral

    Alright, let's be honest, guys. Do you genuinely think he had any intentions actually to roleplay erotically? As this is his first ERP ban, or ban overall, I would say he deserves a second chance. However, I do get that ERP is highly prohibited within the server, thus why I decided to stay neutral in this case. Good luck!

  2. Your In-game name: Theodor/Alfred Biergerstein

    Your Steam ID(in format:STEAM_#:#:#########): STEAM_0:0:82868544

     

    Reason of the warning:

    1. Prop Minge - [Tier I]

    2. FailRP - Speeding for No RP reason [Tier I]

    3. FailRP - Raiding reichstag without advert [Tier I]

    4. RDM - [Tier I]

    5. RDM - [Tier I]

    6. NITRP - [Tier I]

    7. FailRP - NLR [Tier II]

    8. FailRP - Speeding without a RP reason [Tier II]

    9. FailRP - FearRP [Tier I]

    10. FailRP - [Tier I]

    11. Combat Baiting - [Tier I]

    12. ARDM - [Tier II]

    Date you were warned on:

    1. 2019-Jan-13

    2. 2019-Apr-17

    3. 2019-Mar-6

    4. 2019-Mar-6

    5. 2019-Jan-21

    6. 2019-Jan-27

    7. 2019-Mar-21

    8. 2019-Jun-1

    9. 2019-Jun-1

    10. 2019-Jun-10

    11. 2019-Feb-20

    12. 2019-Mar-4

    Admin who warned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID):

    1. Ryszard Altenberg

    2. Sean Devlin

    3. Bill Kearmann

    4. Mattias von Fuchs

    5. Tony Vendetta

    6. Emmerich Leibnitz

    7. Tony Vendetta

    8. Leopold Appes

    9. Leopold Appes

    10. Erich Krüger

    11. Tony Vendetta

    12. Sven Waldren

    Explain the situation of your warning from your point of view in detail: N/A

    Do you think your warning was justified: N/A

    Why should you be unwarned: 3+ year old warnings.

     

    Any kind of evidence: image

    Additional information: N/A

     

    Note: While evidence is not a must it will make your unwarn request more likely to get accepted.

  3. Your In-Game name: Theodor Biergerstein

    Your Steam name: Dimitri Stradzjinkov | STEAM_0:0:82868544

     

    Reportyed staff members In-game name / Forum name / Steam name: Dr Franz Stern

    Staff members STEAM ID: STEAM_0:0:83925177

    Rank of reported staff member (If known): Moderator

     

    What did the reported staff member do to abuse their power: I believe this staff member were FailRPing by jumping into a car at high speed, therefore breaking server rules. Even the Senior Moderator Norbert Heinich would consider the situation in the video as FailRP.

    Evidence:

    The video evidence: https://streamable.com/ak5jkt

    Screenshot of chat: https://imgur.com/a/EWXzGTI

    Note: Evidence is not a must but it is highly recommended to bring some as without it this complaint will most likely end in a your word versus the staff member's word situation. In this type of situation the staff members word will be taken over a players.

  4. Your In-game name: Theodor Biergerstein & Alfred Biergerstein

    Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:82868544

     

    Reason of the warning: [B1] FailRP [Tier II] - Breaking NLR

    Date you were warned on: 2020-11-01

    Admin who warned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Gustav Becker - STEAM_0:0525483914

     

    Explain the situation of your warning from your point of view in detail: My unban request was accepted, but my warning still hasn't been removed for some reason.

    Here is my previous request: 

    Do you think your warning was justified: N/A

    Why should you be unwarned: N/A

     

    Any kind of evidence: N/A

    Additional information:

  5. Your In-game name: Alfred Biergerstein

    Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:82868544

     

    Reason of the ban: FailRP [Tier II] - Breaking NLR

    Date you were banned on: 2020-11-02

    Duration of ban: 2 Days 

    Admin who banned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Trial Moderator Gustav Becker - STEAM_0:0525483914

     

    Explain the situation of your ban from your point of view in detail: So it all began when a criminal got in my car and gunpointed me. When he gunpointed me he also told me to go to the river outside of Berlin. When we arrived at the river, both of us got out of the car and he decided to kill me, and steal my car. I died and didn't even go close to the NLR zone where I got killed. I decided to go the plaza where the resturant "Waltz" was located at. But there I saw a car similar to mine. I decided to check it out and found it was my own car. I unlocked it and drove away from the plaza, and then trial moderator Gustav Becker brought me up to the RS roof, and banned me for Breaking NLR [Tier II].

    Do you think your ban was justified: No, as I wasn't even in the NLR zone, therefore not breaking NLR

    Why should you be unbanned: Because I wasn't even near the NLR zone when I found, and took my car back. I just don't understand why he banned when I wasn't even in the NLR zone. I haven't been banned for NLR for over a year, nor have I broken NLR since I was banned over a year ago.

     

    Any kind of evidence: N/A

    Additional information: As the staff member is newly promoted, I think he should get a better rule knowledge, especially when it comes to the NLR rule. I also asked for explanation by the staff member why I was getting banned for NLR. But the staff member refused to listen to, and instead just instantly banned me from the server.

     

  6. Well this became a cluster fuck rather quickly. Even with the players 26 warns, and 16 Tier Is, as this was indeed purely accidental (in my eyes anyway), this is to be bumped down to a Tier I and ban removed.

    To avoid this in the future, get your names from like german fantasy random name generator to get valid, and correctly joined first and last names. 

    _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    This is the reply by Auster when he decided to give Jakob a Tier I, and you say veteran players can get Tier 1s?

  7. 2 minutes ago, JTA said:

    Im afraid it states in both our conduct & the rules that Veterian Players should know the rules and shluld not be given Tier I Warns

    Where does it say that JTA? I think veteran players also can receive Tier I warnings. In my case it was an unintentional error.

      Tier I - Misunderstanding / Unintentional Error / New Player / an Accident

  8. 24 minutes ago, JTA said:

    Dear Applicant,

    This is a rather funny case, because on Wednesday me, Fabian Otto and Micheal Reitter in terms of Mentoring was in the Admin area on GMOD, giving,Fabian Otto question and answers.

    Now here is why its important for this case, one such thing was a car with Turbo/extended exhausts, now why was it against the rules? Oh yes its Fail RP, it didnt exist in then times.

    Now one thing I noticed done wrong isn't that the rule is wrong, far from it, its actually he didnt check your playtime, I have known you on the server for a very long time and I have full dpubt your a veterian player.

    Id therefore request that this is moved to a Tier II Vet, as Veterians don't get Tier I's, thank you for allowing us to know this little problem that has occured. -1 on this application.

     

    "Tier II - Intentional Rule Breaking /Constant Rule Breaking / Already been punished or told to stop / No Rule Knowledge Whatsoever"

    What do you mean with a Tier II JTA? Do you really think my behavior was intentional?

    As this was the first FailRP warn for "having a turbocharger on the car", I don't think this has to do with constant rule breaking. And you really think I have "no rule knowledge whatsoever"? I'm fully aware of the rules. Do you really think i did this intentionally? 

  9. Your In-game name: Alfred Biergerstein

    Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:82868544

     

    Reason of the warning: FailRP [Tier I] - Having a turbo charger on the car

    Date you were warned on: October 31st

    Admin who warned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Fabian Otto - STEAM_0:1:193161319

     

    Explain the situation of your warning from your point of view in detail: So I had recently bought some new cars from the civilian car dealer. I bought the cars and was about to change the color of them, but I found more options to the car. There were options like like turbochargers, exhausts and skin change (Another color on the car roof). I decided to equip the different options on my car and I was satisfied with all the cars. But then Trial-Moderator Fabian Otto told me it was FailRP with the options on the car, and decided to give me a FailRP [Tier I] for it. 

    Do you think your warning was justified: No, I don't think my warning was justified.

    Why should you be unwarned: Most of the civilian cars from the server are either from the 1950s. I don't see why putting other turbochargers or exhausts on the car would be FailRP, as none of the civilian cars are german. A turbocharger on an car from the 1950s would make sense, as all the civilian cars are American. But if this option now is FailRP, I don't see why there would be an option for me as a player to add new tubochargers or exhausts for the car. I mean it is not possible for me to change the sound preset or maybe even edit the torque. 

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    7.2.8: You are not allowed to edit your vehicle or any other vehicles in any way, unless you are permitted by event planners to do so because of an event or permitted by the Server Management Team.

    I see this warning as not being allowed to edit your vehicles through the "edit properties" option. https://ibb.co/2sthPsq

    But this is not the case. The only thing I did was putting on some car parts on my cars. For example the turbochager which was one of the options. This did not effect the performance on the car, only the appearance of the car. Why is there options for players to add more car parts on the car if it now is FailRP. 

     

    Any kind of evidence: N/A

     

    Additional information:  https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1238235086 - This is the car pack the server is using. All of the cars are American and from the 50s. The car pack isn't really making the server more hisorically accurate. That's why I think adding car parts as turbochargers shouldn't be considered as FailRP. Only the "edit properties" option should be considered as FailRP.

     

    Note: While evidence is not a must it will make your unwarn request more likely to get accepted.