Sean Rowland

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sean Rowland

  1. 52 minutes ago, Samuel Crusader said:

    -1 6 unban requests doesnt change the fact you AMRDM take a year or 2 for a break and then try again

     

     

    26 minutes ago, TheRedSpy said:

    I've been banned for the same length if not longer than you have and from what I've seen from YOUR unban requests you did something that impacts people much more worse than me. I mean it must've been pretty bad if there were 5 "kill yourself"'s in one of your unban requests.

    b0d886aad0b4d23836b57cc6d127f66f7e684d5cc1e6bf8a7ea952227baab67a_1.jpg.b391b6f5ae000ece7942577f2b125475.jpg

  2. Neutral

    As someone who was in the breach shelter when this occurred (as HoEA), the fact that you thought that pulling a gun out and doing what you did, whilst there was at least 5+ armed Foundation personnel shows no real value for life or intention to actually RP. However, as you stated here (and was stated in /ooc after you were banned), what you did was a loophole and not necessarily a direct rulebreak, so whilst I don't think you should be unbanned immediately, I think that your ban should be reduced to several months, as opposed to a permanent ban.

  3. +1

    I really like the concept of turning Foundation members against each-other in a way that gives them a lot of freedom in how to go about it (as opposed to just "bad thing possess your brain now you must kill"), and I also like the more subtle approach to introducing the event.

    Also had nothing but good experiences with you in game and your knowledge around the building tools would lend itself well to making varied events.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Breadmare said:

    yea i know but Changing your appearance And as Class d to avoid AOS again i didnt do anything about it i was just a bystander all i did was argue in Ooc which he then i think got salty about so i dont know why he wants me banned for this?

    Yeah I totally get what you're saying, it's just one of those things that you've gotta suspend a bit of logic for I guess. Just for the record, I don't think you should be punished over it or anything 🙂 I see where your logic was coming from

  5. Just now, Breadmare said:

    read into Lore And I dont Think a simple class D has the Ability to shape shift :] my defence is about me Being accused of metagaming so i see no right in accusing me When his own video shows someone else do it but to kyles logic why dont we just ban everyone who was around him at the time for meta game xoxo Richardson :]

    If you read into the lore, SCPs 173 and 096 would never ever be kept at the same site, and the O5 Council members wouldn't be allowed anywhere near anything slightly anomalous (just as 2 examples). Obviously for gameplay reasons, some logical liberties need to be taken otherwise the server would be a total borefest.

  6. In a world that includes things such as "orange blob that makes happy", "coffee machine that dispenses anything", "teddy bear that can make functioning organs out of stuffing", and "BIG FUCKING LIZARD", someone changing their physical appearance is where the line gets drawn? 😂

     

    +1 (but I don't think a punishment is appropriate), if every game mechanic was taken literally and nobody payed heed to the SPIRIT of the rule, then we'd just be NRP 2.0

  7. Neutral

    A bit more information would be useful, such as roughly how long ago you were banned (to some people, 2 months is "long ago", whereas others may consider "long ago" to be more akin to a year+), what props you spawned (if you can remember, as there's a difference between spawning a few too many cups and spawning giant mingey props), and as @spooky boi said, some more information on your other bans and warns.

  8. +1 

    Nothing that hasn't been said already. It would clear up the Foundation comms, would allow security to have a bit more organisation, and would also be helpful to new players who may get overwhelmed by messages in Foundation comms and perhaps miss an important security message.