Atlass

no lol you used the armour exploit to give yourself a ton of armour to gain an unfair advantage even after you reported it, better yet you used cheats in the MSL by the way, when you're doing security research, you ALWAYS ask the target before doing any unwanted testing, I don't know where in your head you thought it would be a good idea to inject a program in to garry's mod to start exploiting away, if you had come to us BEFORE doing this it would have been a different story

+1/Neutral From a first glance, your event plan is very neatly laid out and easy to understand. However what I feel might contract from that is that your event plan is way too linear. For example, you list people roles and what they will do with an exact description. However most of the time, the events start to steer of from what your original plan was and people don't do exactly what they're told by the EP. Some people just don't like being told exactly what to do by the EP, because in some scenarios there's just a way better way of for example pushing a point. If I see a flank that you might have overlooked, I will take my chances and I will push that. And yes, you could tell battalion and they would then forward that to the individual regiments, but that usually gets fairly messy pretty fast. Other than that I think the Event Plan is extremely creative & nicely laid out. Good Luck!

+1 Your event plan has quite a bit of story & background to it. You also include certain regiments such as RC without detracting from the main part of the event having the clones hold down the fort until the enemies troops have lessened. With you also being able to plan for multiple outcomes shows that you have the ability to understand that your event may not always go your way and you'll have to improvise. You also have previous experience with having been an Event Planner in the past, and you also have Modeler currently. I have no doubt that you'll be able to make fun and enjoyable events. However I do find you to speak up to a lot of things, now this isn't an inherently bad trait, however some may not find it to be just that. Good Luck!

-1 In my opinion, your event plan lacks story & detail, you rely way to heavily on RC & ARC to execute the mission and then give nothing else that's special to anyone else. Now I don't really have an issue with that, however I think the rest of the server would be slightly upset if it was only RC & ARC who got to do something else other than run & gun. On another note, you're dupes are just way to small. I can see the effort that you put in to them, however they're just way too tiny for any large scale player base to properly be able to find any type of value/RC in. I also find you to be quite immature at times, and you have also been blacklisted from EC previously. Therefore I wouldn't really trust you with ULX/SAM. However, what you have going for you though is that I do find you highly committed to what you do, and you are also very active which works in your favour. Good Luck!

!rules are for OOC, what shepherd put above are the rules for IC which CG enforce. Wouldn’t really make much sense including in-character rules in something meant for OOC.

To add to what Aleks said above. 501st ARCs have the same situation were you either choose between the DP-23 or the Z6i. 501st’s main EQ/what pulls players to the regiment is the shotgun, having the change for 104th ARCs would be a good change, for them. However if you’re going to change one, you would have to start looking at changing the majority of ARC’s equipments which kind of negates the point of actually having to choose between one gun or the other.

I mean high command can already promote on cooldown, which they do. However they obviously don’t do it as much because as stated, we have cooldowns for a reason. Giving battalion the ability to promote off cooldown would be rather pointless as we would then be more or less looking at changing cooldowns as a whole. From my point of view, cooldows are already short enough, hell, they could be longer as you usually have people sitting at 1 rank for a longer period of time anyways.

Huge -1 Now you keep reiterating saying that you where not actually implying that you wanted to DDOS him, fine... But none the less, you did say that you had his IP address which is basically Doxing, which has the same exact punishment as DDOS threats. No matter what, you still broke a pretty severe rule. I told you in the discord server to appeal your ban, as you said you was unhappy with it, but instead you told me that you don't care about the ban and went on to say that you were sniffing Henk's IP address which is completely unacceptable. Besides, if you were to get unbanned, what keeps you from trying to do the same thing again out of spite as you really don't seem to be apologetic in any way.

+1 I think it's pretty clear that adding more jail positions should be a no-brainer, we have a lot of prison cells, so why not use them. Besides, this should be able to be added fairly quickly as it only requires a Super Admin to perform a singular command, don't quote me on this though as the Jail system used on Clone Wars might not be so similar to DarkRP as I think.

-1/Neutral I'm slightly torn on this one... I'm going to have to agree with Index here in saying that you have changed quite a fair bit ever since your rank transfer from Battalion. You have begun to speak your mind a little bit more freely in certain discord channels and in TeamSpeak, with some messages coming off as just plain rude to some people or just acting like you don't give a shit in some scenarios. I'm sure you can change for the better again, however with your recent resignation from 501st and EP for Mental reasons and just not being able to keep up. Now you said your plans had changed, but what prevent that from happening again forcing you to do the same thing all over again? You're a great guy Sandy, but I'm not sure if Battalion would still be a good thing for you, as you said "gmod rp is a job".

+1 Uh.... Better equipment? I don't mind. Sure, why not!

-1 I'm just gonna leave this here... You're not an SO+.

+1 Good guy, competent and knows the server really well. Couldn't recommend him for battalion more!

-1 You're essentially suggesting making minging/FailRPing more fun which we don't need more of. There's enough minges as is, and encouraging CTs to go and steal LAATs and crash them and whatnot just doesn't make any sense. Bad behaviours like this should be discouraged, not encouraged.

-1 I see your reasoning here, however I just feel like this would be a complete mess for staff to handle. I havily preffer the current max tuskens being 3, as it's way easier to handle as a staff member. Besides, you argue the point of that they are a tribe, however in my opinion youshould have to make some sacrifices to make it easier to moderate which is evident on the server having not implemented certain features as it would be a complete mess in some certain situations.