Scottish Monk 0 Share Posted August 26, 2020 can we add a rule where one person is only allowed a certain amount of comms at a time I was on this morning and found out some guy had breached all of our comms and he gave all of the comms to his friend (civilian) and he waits till his friend gets back on and he gives them back to have our comms breached for indefinite until a server restart that is unfair Link to comment
Nathan Kennedy 442 Share Posted August 26, 2020 Strip their comma then I am here to launder money Link to comment
Scottish Monk 0 Author Share Posted August 26, 2020 i care why it is a suggestion idc Link to comment
Windows XP 81 Share Posted August 26, 2020 -1 it makes getting information harder overall, if someone is purposefully leaking comms just call staff Clint Westbrook 1 Link to comment
Lorex Krato 101 Share Posted August 26, 2020 Adding a limit would make things difficult for jobs that need/has use for multiple comms, mainly Administrative Foundation Staff. Hoea as a prime example. I dont feel it is necessary, you can use the Teamspeak now, and he only needs to die once to loose it all. Link to comment
Maurice D Biggs 122 Share Posted August 27, 2020 How would you even expect this rule to be enforced? , Please just think if what you are suggestion would actually be doable in the first place. Norra, Willrick, Clint Westbrook and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment
Xunt 565 Share Posted August 30, 2020 Denied On 8/27/2020 at 8:26 PM, Maurice D Biggs said: How would you even expect this rule to be enforced? , Please just think if what you are suggestion would actually be doable in the first place. Link to comment
