gaming time

Well then it's a very good thing a staff member commented on this already and said they had an extensive warn history, isn't it? Not sure why you immediately went for the ad-hominem, but the point still stands. I hope you transform that anger into something useful. Unfortunately, that is on you. If you believed you were banned falsely, then you should have made a case about it. As it stands right now, you have been permanently banned twice and have a lengthy warn history, meaning this obviously isn't the first time you've mucked about. I do believe people can change, as I myself have been warned a few times, mostly Tier I, but that was when I was new and figuring things out. This is why I voted neutral with a leaning rather than a -1 outright. Nevertheless, I do wish you good luck in your appeal, and appreciate that you were respectful towards my response :).

I'm just going to say this: People who are saying he "deserves a second chance" clearly don't see their warn history. This person has already been permanently banned before... they were already GIVEN a second chance, and they went and got permanently banned again for doing a known exploit with the anomaly ball despite being warned on several occasions not to do it. The user in question has an extensive warn history that they don't want anybody to check (which is fair, I wouldn't want my warn history searched either), and has received two previous permanent bans. I'd say that's more than enough warnings. However, I will vote neutral on this, leaning towards -1