GoodSoonYa 0 Share Posted August 4, 2021 Rule for sussing Civs in EZ dose nto apear anywhere in the rules not being allowd but is still being enforced Wtf is it with this staff Quote Link to comment
Drake Watcher 34 Share Posted August 4, 2021 (edited) Notice how the ruleset says "in HCZ/LCZ" specifically. wtf guys scprp staff bad!!! Edited August 4, 2021 by Drake Watcher alex doe 1 Quote Link to comment
Alan J Miller 156 Share Posted August 5, 2021 13 hours ago, GoodSoonYa said: Rule for sussing Civs in EZ dose nto apear anywhere in the rules not being allowd but is still being enforced Wtf is it with this staff oh you! Quote Had a bunch of WL but the cool ones are that I currently have. Marshall, Carter and Dark Salesmen (Current manager) Alpha-1 Commander O5-8 "The Gangster" Director of the Department of External Affairs Link to comment
GoodSoonYa 0 Author Share Posted August 5, 2021 it literely dose not say that you "cant" sus people out in EZ Quote Link to comment
Norra 447 Share Posted August 5, 2021 You can't find civilian uniforms in EZ suspicious. Quote Link to comment
Mark Kuntson 178 Share Posted August 5, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, GoodSoonYa said: it literely dose not say that you "cant" sus people out in EZ No but it says where you CAN. So using something called common sense if the RULES state that you CAN do something only in specific situations this means that NOT in those situations you CAN'T do that thing. kek Edited August 5, 2021 by Mark Kuntson Quote Poop Link to comment
Maurice D Biggs 122 Share Posted August 5, 2021 So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context. If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to". This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X". If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it. Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment. So just .......... be nice .... not annoying. Legate Poofer, Joe Conner, Fixer and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment
Walter Alvarez 140 Share Posted October 25, 2021 On 8/4/2021 at 10:18 PM, GoodSoonYa said: Rule for sussing Civs in EZ dose nto apear anywhere in the rules not being allowd but is still being enforced Wtf is it with this staff On 8/5/2021 at 9:22 PM, Maurice D Biggs said: So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context. If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to". This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X". If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it. Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment. So just .......... be nice .... not annoying. Me reading all this with a smile while my brain melts. Thank you SCPRP-Forum. Quote Link to comment
