CTSkipper

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CTSkipper

  1. Your in-Game Name: Bango True

    Your SteamID:STEAM_0:0:208616849

    Your Age: 14 (15 soon)

    Your In-Game Playtime: 3w6d

    Your Warns:
    Stunstick abuse
    RDM (x1) - Shoot foundation unit without a valid reason
    FearRP User broke out of Tactical Cuffs seconds after being arrested.
    FailRP
    Exploiting (Duping grenades)
    Bodyblocking (Blocking doorway as unarmed unit without valid reason)
    Banned for Exploiting, PME, Mass FailRP, Fail Raid, Fake RP group
    // Note these are all very old, last one in november 2019, got unbanned 1 day after too since rex decided it was a false ban, rie kenn warned me for  the same thing xunt did so disregard one of the exploiting dupe grenades, those were accidental as well.

    Rate Your RP Skills: Due to my experience as the serpents hand (having created multiple characters with backstories, my negotiations and event participation as HoEA and my serious military-style Nu7 rp i think i have a good understanding of how to roleplay properly, i also take my job seriously and act as if i truly were that character when its a very serious job like the serpents hand in which i really become my role. I believe my rp skills to be good or very good, this is how i perceive it. If i went /10 i would say 7/10-8/10

     

    What O5 Designation would you prefer (1-12) and what character?: 05-4: The Veteran i guess since i speak german but appearently apps are open and numbers will be free after dunno

    Have you read and understand the rules of SCP-RP?: Yes i have read the server rules many times and have them in my task bar at all times on chrome, i am also a moderator so i enforce the rules as well.

    Why do you believe you should be part of the O5 Council and what can you bring to the role e.g (Pressure in extreme situations, making the tough decisions): Due to my experience as foundation administration, earlier i played site director and moved on to ethics comittee when that was removed i moved toward HoEA and i have good experience with all of them, i think i am very versatile and can fulfill many roles as i have before, I have had great and good activity or performance on all my site administration and other whitelists, my activity and perfomance are frozen on great/great due to my perfomance (via 05-3 order). I believe my patience, sense of ethicality, and decision making required by the site administration roles which i have excelled at are proof of my worth in the O5 council.

    Can you explain what an O5 does for the foundation and the site itself and why he himself differs from any other site Adminstration?: The Main difference of an O5 is their position, they outrank all of the site, noone is above an O5, this great power comes with great responsibility, you have to fulfill the site administration's role when they arent there, you attend all important meetings and you view important documents important to the roleplay or the server, The O5 does the job of all site administration for the site. The O5 council member oversees the entire site and makes sure everything is going well and intervenes when it is needed, in meetings, in decision-making, negotiations etc. However, the O5 isnt a frontline role, the O5's safety is of critical importance so he will stay back and only act if he believes it to be worthy of an O5's time.

    What is the O5 Council?: The O5 Council is made up of the Overseers of the sites, the highest ranking of all site administration. These individuals have the complete control of the foundation. O5 council members know nearly everything there is to know, apart from secrets kept from specific members. A Regular foundation personnel member has a good chance of never even seeing a member of the O5 council, low ranking foundation personnel dont even know they exist. Most people outside the foundation also dont know they exist or have only heard rumors.  An O5 member is an intimidating person due to their importance and absolute control over nearly everything.

    Are you currently head of a department (Job Manager), general staff in Nu-7 or a Site Director?: I am not a job manager, general stasff in nu7 or a site director, i am however an HoEA, have played ethics and sd a lot before ethics was removed. I am an Nu7 NCO (1st Sergeant) and have been the rank of "Major" before the rework. 

    What Departement would you like to focus on? (Research, Mobile Task Forces, Ethics,...):
    Any department is fine but i am interested the most in the other Site Administration roles, making sure they are doing their jobs well or seeing if they have any trouble or are causing trouble, 2nd mostly wanted by me are Ethical Matters.

    ---
    Please give me feedback, i want to know how i can improve myself.

    Update:
    I am no longer blacklisted from ECM.
    I have been assigned the role of representative for the department of external affairs in the EC.

    This is basically the same as last time as the points havent really changed so yeah this is still relevant
    take that as you will.

  2. SCP-939 has problems that i heard cant really get fixed or bugs too hard, to make up for the billion knockback, low hp, comparitively low dmg id say 939 should get some buffs
    939 NEVER gets played even though it has a cool system in which you can only see people when they move....WHICH IS ANOTHER WEAKNESS. I say for it to be worth it to play the scp, as it almost never gets tested and if it does its just feeding time, it should get more health and/or more dmg so the drawbacks and weaknesses get evened out. Id love to go on SCP with another person sometime but 939 is actually so terrible that the breaches are less fun than sitting around in your cc.
    The amazing CC is wasted due to the job being pretty much unplayable or not fun to play

  3. Your In-game name:  Giovanni Viscello

    Your Steam ID:STEAM_0:0:208616849

     

    Reason of the warning: RDM x220210131044754_1.thumb.jpg.97e15d77e3984289920771d0ddcf3c52.jpg

    Date you were warned on: pic

    Admin who warned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): check pic

     

    Explain the situation of your warning from your point of view in detail: Yeah so after he told me "idk" after i asked if i had to raid to release prisoners, i went in and "failraided" ok fine but then he warned me for rdmx2.  I killed them because i thought it was valid raid or allowed to go in, i even adverted counter cuz they was threatening my guy. 

    Do you think your warning was justified: No

    Why should you be unwarned: Because i failraided, a kill caused by that isnt rdm is it? Like idk if this is the same as its ruled on scp but there its  if i shoot someone because i metagamed them to know theyre enemy, then its metagame not rdm

     

    Any kind of evidence: eh warning admin will admit that its true like i said hopefully, if not im gonna painfully upload a vid

    Additional information: ye

  4. This isnt admin abuse, this is a ban/warn request...i didnt abuse any admin powers here.
    This was at first someone just singing near 457 which then turned into a shrek play. 
    Shortly after this recording (which was mainly outside) i deleted all the props.
    What happened in EZ Big barely included me and hanz gassed everyone in there anyway.
    The fact you mention my ban on the clearly NH2RP Urano who was spamming the chat with "nigger nigger nigger" and admin chat, he also did impostor sus shit and called himself "frederick captona" and went on to minge for the whole day leads me to believe you post this simply to revenge/avenge him.
    I should have deleted everything sooner and for that i am a bit stupid so yeah this should be a ban request / warn request.

  5. -1

    MRDM, Lying to staff and LTAP?
    Offenses seem too harsh and serious for me to believe you should be unbanned...you also didnt list them. Weird that you wouldnt remember the primary reasons you were banned or even accused of.

  6. 1 minute ago, Lando Lovelace said:

    It wasnt, i cant remember the last time you even warned me to stop, i would say "Its Bango Captona!" and you would reply with puggo or something

    Like i've said before, you will claim one thing and i will claim you are lying. Word against word.
    I do not reply with that, i have warned you numerous times verbally.

  7. Just now, John Synergy said:

    However this is what would've made up the brunt of this warning, again the name-calling which can be considered more of a meme nickname shouldn't have done much, if at all. He calls me a memetic hazard all the time.

    His intent was to annoy me, it was clear i wanted him to stop, he used Captona as to make me look like i was what the average captona would be considered as, a minge and rulebreaker. 

     

    1 minute ago, Jason Ray said:

    some call you captona.

    Eh, like Oil but thats the only one i know

  8. Just now, John Synergy said:

    Well I suppose I've been mentioned now. Anyway.
    While I have not seen it much, I have seen Lando being called "Puggo" or "Puggo alt" at about the same frequency. He doesn't like the name just as much as Bango does, but I digress that I do it too. I even nearly replaced his name with Puggo at the start of this response.
    As well as this, I must admit. The warning seems a little unjust for the single text screen that he then removed. And generally I've found Lando to always be saying things as a joke, which is why I think the warning, repercussions on Nu-7, and the entire appeal is a bit of an overreaction. I will wait for more responses before a definitive +1 or -1.

    The Warn was not  about the textscreen. refer to my original explanation.

  9. 2 minutes ago, Lando Lovelace said:

    Mhm, oh i forgot the times over TS as well, you can ask synergy about that one : )

    Notification*

    Sorry you warned me about FailRP text screens, not the fact i called you a Captona

    Simply wrong, i maybe called you puggo 3 times overall, i cannot even begin to count how many times you have called me Captona. You will simply deny this and it will be your word against mine
    What i posted there was an actual joke with substance. That was also at a time where i thought you were joking and not actually doing it with the intent you had. I'll admit that i shouldnt have posted that, but you never told me to stop, after i told you to stop, i never did it again.

  10. Im going to copy paste my explanation i have put in the discord 
     

    Quote

    After verbally warning you about 10 times and letting you off the hook even for failrp textscreens and DTS, and warning you multiple times that you would receive punishment, you decide to keep doing it, You appearently also ignored lorex teleporting to you and telling you to fix your behavior. I also do not call you puggo, i haven't done that since even before i got staff.

    While yes, i did call you puggo once, this was when we 'kind of' got along for a short while.
    I have given you so many warnings and if you didnt take mine or lorex's warning seriously, its your own fault you got warned.
    I can recognize when someone calls me captona as a harmless no-harm-intended joke (plague for an example).
    I believe you do it to annoy me and you do not mean it as a light spirited harlmess joke.
    90 percent of the server treat me like a regular player. You and maybe 3 more people at most call me Captona. They do it on the discord sometimes but it never got to the point where it actually annoyed me because they usually stopped when it was clear i didnt like it.
    You however, ignore my warnings, constantly repeat your behaviour after being told to change it by both me (tens of times) and lorex.
    I dont have a bias, if anything, i have given you MANY chances to not be warned, i also know that you recognized that punishment would arrive if you kept doing it saying "oh bango i said captona, you gonna ban me now?" (along those lines, varying forms).
    This is not only ingame but also in TS, Discord and on forums.
    You claim i call you puggo ingame, which is plain wrong, anyone on the server could see i never responded with that or even responded at all. If anything i warned you about punishment. It is clear you dont mean it as a joke, but as a means of annoying me and disrespecting me.  
    TL;DR
    You should have listened to the staff warnings, you didnt, you got warned for it.