Jonathan Knights

I really can't decide either this should get a +1 or a -1.

As I see it, both sides have a point. This could bring in a new side of rp that hasn't really been touched on or usually goes to shit cause one prick wouldn't shut the fuck up while session was due. 

However, for against, it seems like a waste of time and could go down the route of the whole system being abanadoned after a week of implementation as well as the court itself being swayed one way or another (I do know that you plan to have rules regarding this, however I still think it will happen regardless of how big the punishment is).

I'll leave it as a netural for now.

Fixing security is something that I've also had a hard time coming up with a watertight solution to counter the current shit show that usually is security. 

However, whitelisting HOS and LT's won't fix anything really. Adding in more jobs based around security would add more problems.

The biggest problem with security is that security guards themselves do what they want to do instead of listening to commands half the time. As stated above by Aflie, it shouldn't be rocket science but to Security itself, it might as well be. 

New secuirty should be encouraged and be expected to listen to their higher ups and educate themselves on what the job requires of them. However, I would say good luck to solving that one. 

Nice.

It's subjective. 

I've seen this dog before somewhere..

https://www.pcgamesn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ace-combat-7-jpg-dog.jpg

+1 Not a bad idea at all. 

I would love to critise your unban request, however the spacing and grammar is horrible to read.

In addition, since it's clear that you don't want to return, as stated by someone else, why bother posting a reply since you're going on to a different server. 

It's clear that you have no love for roleplay and if you do, it wasn't shown here. 

-1 This community is better without you and your freind. 

-1

I can see why this is needed, however I don't think it will be benefical in anyway for the server. @popbob is correct in saying that Security in general, especially the newer members, need care and proper teaching in order for them to do their jobs. How this is done, I'm not sure, however like I stated it won't be benefical at all long term.

+1 Sounds pretty good. 

-1 
I don't even think I've seen you play on the server at all, let alone being able to write a worthile SD application.

What are you taking to write these and where can I get it?

@SpyCat27

Please edit this into your application and fill it out

------------------------------------------------

Server you got banned from:

Your name in-game:

Your SteamID:

Admins' name that banned you:

Admin's steamID:

Why did you get banned?:

Evidence(Un-necessary):

Why do you deserve to be unbanned?:

Anything else?:

3 minutes ago, Kian Raanvik said:

I am by no means a map editer, never will be. But isn't there a way to implement the surface we have on the current map into site65? 

Maybe even optimizing it by removing useless parts of the map aswell? Making the map a bit smaller in the process? Also a possibility of making a test server, or even running the map for a week. Seeing how the playerbase enjoys it? I mean man-made bases & clubs shouldn't be a problem? Not sure but hey, it's worth a shot.

Cutting in real quick pls no bully

Short answer; Yes.

Long answer: Eh, not really.

The problem is that you're taking a pre existing map and editing it to fit your own needs. From my point of view, good on paper but annoying to do in practice. Correct me if I'm wrong, since I'm shit at map design, it takes more than just a few snips to make it work. In addition, I may be wrong on this part as well, if the orginal mapper doesn't want us to cut away at their map, then we'll be at square one looking for a new map. 

I'm not entirely versed on editing pre existing maps and repackaging them as you're own. I know that theres 50 bigcity redesigns but those involve serious amount of redesign to the orginal map which makes it different. The same can be done here but we might as well make the map from the ground up. 

+ 1 for reasons above.

In addition, I don't know if this is first rule break or not, if so a warn is suffice. 

As an amatuer map maker who hasn't released a single map yet, it takes more than just a few 1000 hours on gmod to make something viable. I'm no expert and I don't need to be to tell you that theres already other maps out there which already fit our needs better.

I like your enthusiam to help the server however it's best to learn more about map creation as well as the servers needs before actually doing anything.

+ 1

We've seriously need a map change for a while now and this is good to shake things up. Yes surface jobs would probably need a bit of a tweak, but as far as I can tell, this map will work well for the server long term. 

Edit: Changed to Neutral.

After reading about @Xunt's opinion on switching maps, I feel like I've jumped the gun on wanting a new map. Yes, having a new one would be beneficial too us, shake it up a bit, however I realised that we can't just take a map from the workshop and slap it onto the server. The map needs to built for our needs from the ground up most likely. 

I'm still all for a new map, like everyone else, however I think it should be tailored to what the community needs the most instead of replacing it with an entirely different one. 

Neutral on this one.

Seems a good idea on paper but I'm not sure how hard it is to code something like this, let alone if it's really needed. 

The only way I can see this actually being used is, as you said, for Manufacturing Personnel to organise/ store ammuntion. Maybe it could also be used by Nu7 for extended missions on the surface, however since everyone is rolling around in money, they can just buy ammo from the surface as well. 

2 minutes ago, MinedCube said:

I can proof u that isnt an alt! But I dont know how to proof it . I can send u his discord!

 

Post the proof here.

Seems to me an unlikely story to explain the supposed alt. 

Pre-emptive -1 for now until evidence is given that the alt isn't an alt. 

@Randy Walters is correct. See below for evidence:

https://www.gametracker.com/player/ZeroL3gend5 [W-G]/208.103.169.212:27015/

Here is the overall playtime. While getting evidence for this, it's also worth noting that the playtime was cut in half over the last 3 days when I ignore the outlier. This could be that it was a weekend or he had nothing better to do that day. However, 20 hours in a single day is extremley unlikely. 

Overall, I'm reinforcing my -1 already due to this. 

I've forgotten who that is. 

+ 1

Basically agree with what others have posted before me. It really needs to be replaced at the least however but getting it removed sooner rather than later is paramount. 

23 minutes ago, Vaas Alex said:

I'm seeing if this community has changed and whether it will accept me with my playstyle. if not, then on my way I be for another half a year.

The community won't accept your playstyle. In fact, it actively punishes people who act like a minge within the community.

Instead of taking another half a year off, I suggest go finding another server that allows your playstyle and rewards it, instead of sticking around hoping that this community will change for you.

Neutral 

- 1 See edit below.

As others have stated and so will I, I've not seen you before on the server. The application itself is average though you could've done without the interating '- - - '.

I'd say get another weeks playtime in and get people to know you then try and apply again. You'll get a better review rather than just pass the requirements for playtime. 

Edit: Changed because the applicant inflated his playtime to meet requirements. Evidence is found in a few posts below.