chaos 7 Share Posted November 3, 2020 (edited) ok i say b7 should be up dated as i don't find it fair that b7 caz legit wering a holl hazmat suit can still can be infectid by 008 and b7 unit should have a divise that can check if someone been infectid with 008 as in the chaos that happen oftem people will get infect and don't relise and make the b7 commander a lv40 to play as him also the people that think it a bad idea don't leave messages Edited November 4, 2020 by chaos Windows XP 1 Link to comment
Lando Lovelace 211 Share Posted November 3, 2020 Most retarded thing i have ever seen, no. B7 Does not need a Cl4 Keycard, yes to the infection by 008 and 008 only as 049 does not "Infect" you as 008 would And no? also i cant understand 90& of this -1 Windows XP 1 i have overdosed 4 times since being banned from scp rp Link to comment
James Whisper 36 Share Posted November 3, 2020 (edited) "Ok, I say B7 should be updated as i dont find it fair that b7 is legit wearing a full hazmat suit and still can be infected by 008 and 049. The B7 commander should get a level 4 keycard as he is a commander and all other commanders get a cl4 card. Can the b7 have a device that can check if someone has been infected with 008 because in the chaos of a 008 breach people usually get infected and dont realise. ps. I thing we should be able to buy weapons from mc&d as long as you are in disguise" -1 b7 cmdr does not have cl4 for a reason, the device would be coding and not being able to buy from mc&d is because as foundation you should not be buying from a goi. Also this should be in suggestions not in job suggestions. Edited November 3, 2020 by Jonathan Lee Link to comment
v44su 43 Share Posted November 7, 2020 (edited) This idea has some base to it. I fell that B-7 for some reason can be infected by 008-2 even tho they are in a full hazmat suit. 049 on the other hand kills people with his hand and "cures" them so its not an infection. B-7 commander as long as its not whitelisted a CL4 keycard is 1. Not necessary and 2. could be abused. I feel like B-7 commander should be a whitelist job as all the other commanders because they still hold a significant amount of power on the site. They are a containment commander which means that if there is a breach and there is no CL5 personnel, SD or E-11 commander they will be in full control of the entire site for the duration of the breach, this is why I feel like B-7 commander should be whitelisted. Generally to your suggestion: Neutral Edited November 7, 2020 by v44su Point about 049 popbob 1 Quote Whitelists: Previus: All Nu-7, Head Of External Affairs, O5-8, Beta-1 "Cauterziers" Riot Unit and Sentinel Unit, ECMx2, O5-9 "The Secret Keeper", Nu-7 Commander, CI Delta, HoEA, Alpha-1, Omega-1, ???, Maxwellist Acolyte, E-11 Commander, Site Director, ISD, HoMD and MC&D Salesman. Link to comment
Nathan Dixon 75 Share Posted November 8, 2020 B-7 are already immune to 008 last I checked about 2 days ago They don't need to be immune to 049. Even in SCP:CB the E-11 are cautious around 049. Their armour or any hazmat suit isn't going to save them from 049. B-7 commander doesn't have clearance 4 as they don't need it, clearance 4 only opens the EC control room door and maybe player-placed ones. Clearance 3 already opens basically everything, including checkpoints, GG, MT, GA, EZ lower, which is all B-7 need to open. Just play an armed unit commander if you want clearance 4 and a gun. Having B-7 commander being whitelisted might actually be a good idea. E-11 already exists making the commander for it basically just a rip-off E-11 flamer. Some better guns and you might actually get B-7 using comms and doing actual things. Something to make a job suggestion for, I guess. -1 Link to comment
Kvisten 521 Share Posted November 8, 2020 (edited) -1 B-7 do not require an update. B-7 is fine as it is. The whole point of B-7 is to teach new players about containing SCPs and the general role of being a containment unit. 57 minutes ago, Nathan Dixon said: Having B-7 commander being whitelisted might actually be a good idea. E-11 already exists making the commander for it basically just a rip-off E-11 flamer. Some better guns and you might actually get B-7 using comms and doing actual things. Something to make a job suggestion for, I guess. There is no point in whitelisting B-7 Commander. Because that job is also meant to teach players how to play as a Commander and how to act in different situations and how they should lead their men. Also who is willing to own/manage B-7? I mean it has to be either some staff member or someone else trustworthy person. B-7 was simply a replacement of Containment Specialist. The whole purpose of Containment Specialist is to teach players how to recontain SCPs etc. I would honestly see Containment Specialist more than B-7 because there is no real difference with them excluding the B-7 Commander job and weapons that they got. Both jobs did the same as eachother in terms of recontaining SCPs. Giving B-7 Commander a Clearance level 4 keycard is not really needed. This will just result with extremely powerhungry people act as they are something and ordering everyone around. Look at Site Advisers. They got CL4 keycard and they are really powerhungry. Literally whitelisted NU-7 enlisted started ordering security when they did not have the authority to do it or even the reason to start with and they have been told not to by SMT and higher ups of NU-7. Do you honestly think that B-7 will be an exception regarding this? Also pretty sure B-7 are immune to 008-2. If not then that needs to be fixed because that is really retarded. They are meant to deal with biological, chemical and radiological hazards. Makes no sense really if they can be infected by something that they are meant to be dealing with. Due the fact of them having the proper suit and gear to not be infected. Edited November 8, 2020 by Kvisten Bread, popbob and James Whisper 3 Link to comment