Kvisten

Damn what a good feedback on a application Anyways +1. -Has competence. -Seen active the recent days or week.

I do not want to be a dick or something but didn't you get warned and tiered yesterday as ECM when you were running around with a radio on high volume. Which is just another thing that may piss players off. Because you getting mad over someone pissing players off with voice changers while you are doing somewhat of the same thing but with a radio instead is just really weird. Especially when it happened the exact day of this person being banned. Now for the real topic. Imma say neutral because I need the story of the staff that banned you. Because it said that you got banned for "NH2RP, Trolling and Acting like a general nuisance. So I want to hear how Azazel explains the reason for your permaban even though you just used voice changers and throwing around ammo boxes.

-1 -Extremely underdetailed.

Well they are better than the laws that O-1 had IMO.

+1 -Good application. -Has good experience with leadership/high ranking positions. Hehe Sarkic tryout

-1 Who is willing to code this just for 096? Not needed and you could just say in /looc or something that you got a target and tell the person to release you.

-1 -App is meh. -Not known. So get yourself more known to the community.

+1 -App is good -He is quite active

+1 -Good app -Has previous leadership experiences

+1 -Seen him in-game as Site Director and he is a good example of one. -App is good. Btw when Thaumiel-7? I miss Lockheed.

Neutral -App is good -I have not seen you once so I have no clue how competent you are

Use the template. Server you got banned from:Your name in-game:Your SteamID:Admins' name that banned you:Admin's steamID:Why did you get banned?:Evidence(Un-necessary):Why do you deserve to be unbanned?:Anything else?:

Dumb

+1 -Competent -The app itself is pretty good -Should be given a chance Here is a video that always comes up in my mind whenever I hear the name "Melo Samue" https://streamable.com/xviua8

-1 -Minge -Not the right person for staff

Still? Even if it is trapped. Why should you even shoot at 457? You know it will increase in size if you shoot at it. Yet you do it with the reasoning "it is trapped". It doesn't matter it is stuck or not it is still FailRP if you shoot at 457.

-1 Now I understand the situation. However, shooting at an SCP such as 457 even if it is recontained or not it still counts as FailRP. Same thing goes for shooting 1048 (except for -A) or 999. I even saw Lunar Colony shooting at 999 as a joke and got warned for FailRP and he did the same as you. He did a unwarn and got denied because the warn was valid. You wouldn't shoot the SCP just because. Especially with an SCP that grows in size when being shot upon which makes it even harder for B-7 and E-11 to recontain the SCP. There is nothing much to write besides from the warn is valid due the fact you shot at SCP-457 which just makes it harder for the rest to deal with the recontainment of the SCP. If it was let's say 682 or 939 then it would be understandable because you need to kill those Keter SCPs.

-1 There is nothing much to say besides from what Bread and Gritz already said. Not good of a suggestion.

Well so far it sounds pretty nice. Sure it got some bad things however, there are more things that are better. Such as the medical system, NU-7 and the other departments.

+1 -Competent -Not a minge Could be a fun target to kill

-1 -App is meh -I have never seen you once