Jonathan Knights

- 1 Should be a perma, considering the fact that it was MRDM. I'm surprised that you were let off with a week long ban.

+ 1 If the admin who banned you is willing to give you a second chance, then I might as well give you a second chance as well. Don't scew up this time.

-1 Seems to me that you still act childish, as others have pointed out, more than a year after your ban. In adition, the reason for wanting to be unbanned shows that you don't want to actually improve yourself. Making an unban simply for "trolling", as pointed out by your supposed alt, is a waste of time on your end. If you're looking for attention, you won't find much here. Word of advice; If you want to change, then show that you can do it and maybe then we'll consider unbanning you. Edit: Forgot to request thread lock by Heirarchy.

The first SCP you saw/ heard about: SCP-173 or SCP - 106 Your first favourite SCP: SCP-106 I'm pretty sure was the first favourite, now it's the Three Portlands. First SCP you played: Technically, WG-SCP, however I did play SCP-CB How old were you when you discovered SCP: About 17/ 18.

Your name in-game: Jonathan KnightsYour SteamID: STEAM_0:0:54350496Person's you report name: Steve Alas & Micheal PhillipsPerson's you report SteamID: STEAM_0:1:193980839, STEAM_0:0:210368599Why do you want them banned?: Both guards initially killed me, saying that I was "too annoying". This continued on and they focused me multiple times, killing me in the process. In addition, Steve Alas also killed a fellow guard without reason. Evidence(It's a must. If not provided, request is denied.):

As much as I wanted to add it in, I decided not to.

In Game Name: Jonathan Knights Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:54350496 Age: 21 Past experience in leadership/ high ranking roles: Site Director, Head of Security, Site Advisor, Former Sergeant for Beta-1 Why do you feel that you'll be a good Site Director?: I've had quite a lot of experience playing as Site Director before it was whitelisted as well as a lot of time playing other roles on the server and as such, I feel that I'm capable of being a good Site Director. What role does the Site Director have the on site?: The role of the Site Director is to oversee the current site that they're presiding in to ensure that it runs smoothly and to deal with on goings within the site itself. In addition, the Site Director only responds to the O5 Council for advice, orders and decisions. The Site Director cannot overrule the O5 Council when given orders from the Council. What is the O5 Council?: The O5 Council is a group of 13 individuals who oversee the operation of the entire Foundation. The O5 Council votes on decisions regarding the Foundation with O5-13 being a tie breaker in cases where the Council cannot decide on what action to take.

+1 For reasons above.

+1 Agree with what Atomik stated previously.

+1 Considering the time length after you were banned, I'm willing to allow a second chance.

I remember V2 enough to tell you that I barely remember it all

I'd actually love to see how it'll end up. To be honest, I'd upvote the changes through and through without hesitation.

The modem isn't broken. The reason why it isn't working is because hierarchy disabled the function after finding out that it can cause lag due to bad programming on how it handles inputs and outputs.

An interesting idea. Will keep tabs on this.

@Atomik Similar to what I came up, but you expanded it pretty heavily. I'd still say its in the US, personally in 'lore'.

Huh, neat.

+ 1 PD needs some love as well.

As we all know, the IT Technician job isn't something that's really used and does need some fixes to get it back into shape as well as some new additions to it. So far, I've encountered possibly the only issue with the job that stops it from being useful; The WIOS OS and the modem. These two things currently are not able to be used in conjunction with Wire, E2 etc, due to unknown reasons. Testing it in singleplayer, as shown below, shows that I'm able to wire the modem to a constant value and set and get a value from the modem itself. However, when I attempt to do the same thing on the server, this happens. Note that the wiring of the constant value doesn't actually wire, nor does the setting and getting of the value work. I can only speculate that something to do with permissions with the WIOS and Modem stops the player from setting, getting the values as well as wiring the modem to other things. If this was fixed; it will open new doors for the IT Technician, though I've known that creating doors is possible using a bit of know how and a lot of patience. While it takes long to create, it also means that the door itself is unhackable if the terminal has a password set in the first place. I have two suggestions for this; 1) The WIOS terminal is not allowed to have a password to allow GOI's access the terminal and open and close the door with a 1 or 0 or open or close. Though this means that other people could screw around with the computer without the IT Technicians consent. 2) The WIOS terminal does have a password, stopping the problem with people messing around on the computer, though the password needs to be universal (Say 1234 or password) easy enough for GOI's to remember and use without needing to stab an IT Technician or two for the password. Any other suggestions for this would be greatly appreciated.

I would also + 1 this if possible. Would like to see it happen.

I'm sure Ken the MTF E-11 unit would appreciate it. -1

+ 1 There is no need for a system like this.

Predetermined setups for MTF are pretty handy when you want a kit for specifics, though usually the 'meta' guns are always picked over everything else. It would probably work like how CW can save attachments in file so to speak. Overall, would be a useful addition if you're not the type of guy to scroll down though as stated, doesn't take to get the equipment you need. Neutral for now.

I agree with the statements made above. Leave it open for now. -1

This radio was tested in the past as previously stated by others. I think the reason why it was removed was due to performance issues(?), though I'm unsure. Though I would like to see it return for a few groups as a testing ground before being adopted wide spread to see how it goes. +1

There's no need to remove the IT Technician role in favour of site administration having computers. Expect a post about possible fixes and/or changes to the IT Technician job from me in the future as I see the IT Technician job as a potential benefit to the server. -1