327th Weapon Change

[Hazel 32]

What your suggestion is: Change the weapon loadout of 327th

Scriptfodder/workshop link: N/A

Any additional information: With the removal of the E-22 and TL-50/T-21 in exchange for the T-21B at NCO it feels like a downgrade because ETs and NCOs have to wait until CO to do their job that is in the frontline, we would prefer that the T-21B was removed and given the E-22 or Repeating Blaster back.
 -Thanks 327th

Edited February 10, 2021 by Hazel

[Ferghh 91]

+1 

T21B will not assist pushes (what our job is,) Like the TL50 which everyone in the regiment had. Reversing the changes would help the regiment and everyone in events in general.

[Jenson_ 62]

+1 
. E-22 is better then T21B 
. We have no guns until CO basically 
. With this T21B how are we gonna frontline with a long ranged weapon ( we are called a frontline regiment for a reason )
. Just please do something

 

[Harvey_ 39]

+1 I feel like the removal of the E-22 and the TL50 is horrible mainly because CTs when they join are not going to have anything till CO and therefore they will get bored and leave this is bad on a regimental POV as we will lose a lot of members due to the fact of we have no weapons till CO, 501st get the Shotgun as soon as they join which keeps ETs staying as its really fun because its a good gun. It was fine when we had the TL50 at ET we was doing well with members for once and it was going good and it was fun. 

All im asking is for the E-22 back and the TL50 maybe at NCO. 

 

[Zen - Jon 5]

+1 - everything that is written already, this change make more than half of our regiment useless in frontlines.

[Barry 137]

Just going to post what i wrote in weapon feedback - 

the 327th changes are shit, the front line aspect of 327th has been removed with the removal of the IHR and E22, the T21B isn't suited to front line engagement at all with the slow fire rate, the only viable weapon we have for front lining now is the mini gun, which doesn't reliably do the damage with its spread. i reckon i speak on behalf of just about all of 327th when i say please revert it back to what it was!

[Victor 210]

+1

No need to take the weapons away in the first place, i would agree if you took the repeating blaster away but there was no need to remove the E-22

[ethan 86]

+1 why was the change even needed? because too many people use the e 22 or the repeating blaster? who cares, its just making the regiment shit... like 501st get repeating balster and a republic shotgun, their repeating blaster should have been removed as they already have an op asf weapon 327th minigun is good but its not as good as the republic shotgun. no idea why the change happened and if there was a minor reasoning then it was that could have been discussed with hierarchy

[Hogus 77]

+1 
 

[Shepherd 98]

+1

Reasons already stated

[[W-G] JH 87]

+1

Of course I am going to +1 this, but I really don't think that the change was needed. We had zero complaints, and are pretty balanced in events anyways, don't see why it was taken away. If anything, I personally would like the repeating blaster back at minimum, but reverting it to how it was seems fair, since I don't see why it was taken in the first place.

[hathruthless 10]

+1 want the old ones back

 

[Balchin 4]

+1 it is needed to do our job we are a frontline regiment for crying out loud we need weapons at ranks such as ET and NCO we want our old stuff back 

Edited February 10, 2021 by bbalchin82

[Silent 148]

buff the minigun a lot

[Reggie 3]

+1 
Reasons already stated above 

[Harvey_ 39]

3 minutes ago, Silent said:

buff the minigun a lot

also this yeah lmao.

 

[Johnn 32]

+1

327th with the T-21, Z-6 and the E-22 was hot. the T-21B doesn't sound so hot alongside the removal of the T-21 and the E-22. It's not really realistic to have all their ET and NCO to push with the DC-15A until they reach CO.

It sounds like a worse gun, from what I've heard. Alongside that, there seems to be incredible backlash from 327th with regards to the T-21B. 

[Victor 210]

also increase the minigun damage innit bruv

 

[Hazel 32]

tru

 

Edited February 10, 2021 by Hazel

[Rock 42]

+1 all has been said

[Bean 80]

+1

You took the heavy weapons away from the heavy weapons frontline regiment and gave them a BTEC Westar. Plus they're clearly not happy with the change.

[Dyno 98]

+1 

I tested the new weapon out last night with a few others and I can sincerely tell you that it’s garbage. With a few fixes it could be alright but it sure isn’t a good fit for 327th. I think they were fine the way they were already. This just makes them kinda useless.

[Luigi 5]

+1

 

[Bansheey 304]

+1

[Hazard 25]

+1 dont understand the reason to remove 2-3 weapons from the frontline regiment and replace it with 1 weapon that you only get at CO+