Feymous

Neutral 

Well I read your application and it was quite good, just some smaller things what Klavigar already pointed out. 
So the only reason that I will remain neutral to this, is that I never had any interaction with you. 
The point is that you can write the best application but still be a complete idiot. 
But according to the reactions on this and of the people I asked you are a nice lad.

So good luck to you

-1 
Here is the reason why:
I aggree with Sooth here, as your application lacks of detail ( I wont give anymore examples as Sooth stated and proved it perfectly )
and some answers are incorrect like the 4th question.  Staffing is OOC and so it cannot be punished IC except higher ups get informed or they witness it themselves. 

I cant remember to have seen you rp or that I talked to you, so I need judge your application just on the application itself and not with any personal experience. What results in a -1 as its simply not detailed enough or at some points incorrect, but as I see you are quite known I would recommend reapplying with better answers. 

Good luck!
 

Neutral 
Tbh I would give a +1 normally but as I don't really know much about the things you've done I would rather not involve myself in this, but I think everyone can change IN TIME in really depends for every person, some people just take much time to grow up and act mature. But why should he make a 3rd unban request if he intents to minge again... It's not even worth writing otherwise. 
So like I said I believe everyone can change in their behavior it just takes time, so I would give him another shot at this but due to the lack of knowledge to this hole thing I would rather stay neutral. 

But Pagan and LegitLund, -1ing someone for minging with that childish behavior of yours is not supporting your point at all, a simple -1 I dont believe you can change would've been enough but you started to disrespect. I dont know anything about how his behavior was but yours clearly wasn't much better in this argumentation. I know Pagan can be very mature and professional so keep it that way even on things like this.
No offense ment its just not supporting your points ( to all that try to defend their behavior )

+1 
When I read through your staff app, it was an great improvement, you not only improved your answers but you actually listened to what I wrote under your previous, what is very good. I will not comment on every answer as there is no point if its simply correct. 
Your first part was very detailed so there is nothing much to add, maybe some smaller things but you will learn those things simply by experience at some point. The second part could be a tiny bit more detailed but the answers are on point so it does not matter that much. I also like the fact that you have included the handbook and rules doc. in your answers as a link what is always a good thing to do. 
I never met you ingame or anywhere else but the improvement of your staff app and the fact that you have listened to my advices tells me you are staff material and have the necessary dedication to become a great staff member. 
Due to my reasoning I will +1 and hopefully we can welcome you in the HLRP staff team.

+1 
Know Wanted for quite a while,  in the time I was still active on the server he was one of the most active people I know and always was helpful as well as reliable.
Though he never actually spoke I still think he has great staff potential.
Also he is a 212th legend. 
 

+1 
(Reasoning below)
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

I am silently teleporting to the accused player to see if he is actually killing people. If I do not see him actively killing people I am checking BLogs to see if he has killed other Players just before I arrived. If not I am asking the accuser of what he has seen. If I do find any kind of evidence of the player killing someone I am bringing him into a Staff Location, question him about it and administer appropiate punishment.

ok, I would get accusor and accused both into a sit and ask them what happend and ask for proof, your way is fine but try to always get both sides of a story. 
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

I am telling the player that he can join most factions by going to their main building. If the player doesnt know the way I am also explaining him the way there.

Maybe you could also tell them what every faction is really about and stuff like that, but its fine I guess
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

I warn the player for FailRP if it seems like an accident and he is new. If the offending player is a veteran or obviously breaking RP I am banning him for 1 or 2 days.

Yeah like already said, try to get his side of the story, but the warn is fine 
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

I tell him that the rules specifically tell everyone to use their brain and that all situations not specifically listed but still deemed FailRP will be punished accordingly by a Staff Member.

Yup, but you would still warn him for failRP aswell.
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

I am telling the offender that abusing loopholes within the rules is not allowed and no excuse at all to break other rules. I will punish him for the rule he has broken and contact a Staff Manager+ to deal with the situation accordingly.

You could also tell SMT about this loophole so it can be prevented in the future. ( If thats what you mean with contacting Staff Manager to deal with that )
 

On 2/14/2021 at 8:59 PM, malnjayz said:

Power Gaming describes any action that would make a character extremely strong, intelligent or also the usage of /me to get out of a situation you are not happy with. For example "/me breaks out of cuffs" or "/me figures out the answer to this puzzle".

(All the answers before that question seems fine so I wont react to them )
Yep also correct, so simply an action you have no power over IC:

Ok so the following questions were correctly answered aswell. 
I dont know where to start tbh, 
your application improved alot than your first. 
In my opinion your first part of the application is a bit short, but not wrong so I just wished more detailed answers but the second part of your application is very well written, your answers could stand on some spreadsheet if I am honest. 
Very well done on your application, but I will also +1 it as I got to meet you IC and in CFU and you were always very mature and reliable, you are clearly staff material and deserve your place within the staff team. 

Good luck and hopefully I can welcome you soon

+1 
I mean I am not NRP staff so I dont know their standards but the application seems well written and detailed. 
When I was your Leutnant quite some time ago, you were very dedicated to your work and always friendly and open to other people. 
So I think you have staff potential and have the characteristics to become good at it.

I wish you good luck 

neutral 
I understand Banshees point, as everyone makes mistakes sometimes, but someone that is senior Admin should know how to behave. As you are normally the one that warns / bans people. 
So thats why I would rather stay neutral to this as both sides are understandable

+1 
As already said the application is well written and you have good amount of experience. 
I also think you are a suitable for staff as you have the required maturity and dedication.
You are well known and respected in the community so it will be a +1 from me.
Good luck to you anyway.

-1  ( reasoning below )
 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

1 ) You are told by a player in admin chat that another player is randomly killing people: I would first teleport to the player that reported, bring him aside and ask what happened. From there I would teleport to the player who has been accused of randomly killing people in cloak to spectate him for a bit. Durring this I would check his damage logs to see if he indeed damaged/ killed someone, if he indeed damaged/killed someone outside the role playing aspect I would bring him to a empty room and told him to explain himself, from there I could decide the punishment. In the case that I just see him shooting at everyone I would immediatelybring him to an empty room told him to explain himself before I decide the punishment.

Ok, first I wouldnt spectate hime for "a bit" as the other guy literally has to wait that time, so just get them both in a sit area first. You can watch him after the sit to see if he behaves.  And please read through your application as the last sentense is not making any sense.

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

2 ) You are asked by a player about how to join a faction: I would tell him about all the factions he can join and describe them a little so he can understand what they do. Then I would give him a link to our discord/forums and explain him that in there he can put up an application for the faction he is intersted in.

First of he needs to apply for the faction IC, as I have written down this information under nearly every Staff application you could've known. But yeah explain them what they are and do. 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

3 ) You catch somebody not performing RP and messing around: I would pull him aside and tell him that what he/she was doing was againts the RP element of the server and that they can´t be going around ignoring the RP. Depending on the rank of the player and the severity of messing around I would give them a punishment based on those two things and gave them a link to the server rules for them to read.

Depending on the rank of the player ?  So NCO = Warn and CO+ = ban   ?  Please no.  Maybe playtime is the word you were looking for but the IC rank shouldnt be too much an indicator of a punishment.  ( that is just my opinion and can be wrong ) 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

4 ) Somebody acquires a rank but is not willing to RP with it properly: As in the case of the question above I would again pull them aside and tell them that they can´t be ignoring the RP element of the game. Again depending on the players rank and the severity of the offence I would punish them accordingly and also tell their superior about it.

Yeah punish them accordingly and notify their superior if needed.

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

5 ) A player is prop spamming: I would first pull them aside and tell them that what they are doing is againts the server rules. Depending on the severity of the prop spam I would punish them accordingly for it.

Maybe freeze the props and make him to delete his spawned props would be kinda good so the server doesent dies.

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

6 ) Somebody does not agree with the outcome of an RP situation therefore he decides to break RP and act OOC: I would tell him that even if he/she doesn´t like the outcome of a RP situation, they can´t go out of character to change it by breaking the rules. Depending on the severity again I would punish them accordingly for this.

As you have written often  depending on ...  punish accordingly.  Please be more specific like I would punish him for fail RP  or NITRP or stuff like that. Please include this next time if you get denied. 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

7 ) You bring a player into a sit and punnish him however he does not agree with your decision and keeps arguing: I would show him the evidence again and the reason for his punishment. If he keeps on argruing about it I would call for a higher rank staff member to talk with him about his punishment. I would also give him a link to our unwarn forums so he can apply for a unwarn/unban if he still belives that he/she was right.

Good solution, there is nothing missing ( if I remember correctly )

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

8 ) Someone commits FailRP but claims the specific instance of FailRP you warned him for is not explained in detail within the rules: If the FailRP he commited isn´t specified in the rules I would try to solve this with a higher rank staff member. I would also put a link for the unwarn forums so he can try to appeal his punishment. I would then speak about the thing the player broke with a server management  members, if they should add it into the server rules.

Trying to get another staff is always a reasonable answer but try to explain what you would do if no one could help you so you need to make a decesion.    Using loopholes in server rules is a big no no.  And as staff you have the ability to think for you own so if you truely think he was commiting failRP than warn / ban him for it.

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

9 ) A player evidently breaks a rule however he makes a good point in his defence by abusing loopholes within the rules: I would tell him not to try going around rules by loopholes and punish him accordinngly for that situation. I would later bring up that/those loopholes with a server management memeber.

Telling SMT about it is a good point, however I still would like more detail in you answers. 

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

5 ) Define the term of Combat Baiting:

 This is a situation where you put your character in dangerous environments on purpose so you can engage in CombatRP without technically breaking any rules.

Well combat baiting is breaking a rule so yeah.  
You bait your oponent into engaging you.   
I mean a vulcan is a dangerous environment too but has nothing to do with combat. So try to specify this environment better / more.

 

On 1/25/2021 at 12:21 AM, Klavigar said:

Explain in length and detail as to why you deserve staff more than other applicants. Explain what you will bring to the staff team and your strongest assets as a person/potential staff member (250+ words):

I have always been interested in becoming a staff memeber. From the first time I joined a Gmod server. From that time I have joined many servers and with that my interest to becoming a staff member grew. Durring those times I found myself on my first Werwolf server the SCPRP. Where I got quite familier with the seriousness of the Werwolf community. I was very active on that server playing on it nearly every day. I gather a lot of expirience when it comes to Passive and Combat RP. I was also accepted for the scp-1048 job, which game me a lot more interest in the server as a whole. After some time I started to get bored of SCP RP and eventualy I took a long break from Werwolf gaming as a whole.

At the start of Covid–19 I started playing again this time on SWRP where I met a lot of great people a got a lot of new expierence from it aswell. To the point of me reachig a Hierarchy member so I now have first hand expirience now how to manage a faction.

In total I have around 1800+ hours on Gmod which most of the has been spent on RP and mainly Werwolf servers. The reason I think I should be picked is my activity which is usually very high and the fact that I can solve problems carefully even in the heat of moments which can help in many situations where you have think carefuly even under the pressure of something and give it your best.  Overall I am generaly a nice guy who is pretty good to have around, but sometimes I can get quite angry. I am still workning on improving that.

Well, like I said earlier PLEASE read through your staff app after you have written it to avoid any spelling mistakes. 

OK,  your answers were correct in the gist but for me they are not written in enough detail as I have mentioned before. 
Also I have seen many spelling or grammar mistakes and they just look bad on a staff app. 
Another point is, that in the last past you have written most of your server experience and not about you as a person. The last part is why you should be accepted into staff and if I am honest I am not really convinced as there are not really key arguments. 

I wish you good luck but due to my reasoning I wil -1 it as I think you are not ready to be staff yet, or at least it didnt really show in your staff app.

+1
How da fuck is VePo still alive xD 
I mean it wont necesarrily increase the numbers as people who are MG or Sanitäter cant be in VePo anymore as you cant have two special jobs. And tbh as VePo is not that really needed because its doing the job normal members of Orpo can do in legit the same way, so when I was a CO it was more a ceremonial unit than anything else as the interest of it never was that big. Because like I said they are doing nearly the exact same job as normal patrols so in my eyes it was never needed ( it was like that when I was Orpo maybe it changed ).
Vepo can perform well and can be active if you put effort in it, its not like Sani or Mg where everyone wants to join from the start, so you need to put more time as the Captain / Head of it than in the other special jobs.
It could be good so I will give a +1 for it for now even though I dont see the point in even having VePo. 
Anyway good luck 

Just now, [WW2] Dr Baron von Keller said:

All right so as an german I can assure that your name "Anders Deutscher Ehrenreich (- Other German Honorreich)" is not a valid RP Name, it literally doesnt make any sense and in my entire life in germany I havent heard of any german person called "Deutscher" and even if "Deutscher" would be valid the rest of your name is even worse. 

I thought so too and I am german aswell but he literally gave you prove that it can be a name, it still sounds weird as fuck but he just combined two names that are very evry unusual but still they are names, and as this Anders Deutscher Ehrenreich isnt a famous or known person there is no reason why the ban should be valid

2 minutes ago, Johan Schneider said:

I issued the ban since he is a veteran player and he already had 25 warnings, he should have known at least. And like I said, 2 German staff members have stated that it is indeed FailRP.

He legit gave you just proove that the name was legit, I am german and I never even thought about that this could be a name so even the other said it was failrp, maybe they didnt think it was possible that it is an actually name so I dont think the ban is justified as it isnt a fail rp name. It might be a bit mingy but apperently it is a name

very interesting.
how many fucked up german names are there xD, I mean as there is a person with that name born in 1941 ( I guess I cant speak swedish or danish or what it is ) it would be legit in my opinion. As @JTA already said I would like to hear what Johan has to say to this. But I will change it to + 1 as a none-german-speaking person you cant really know that "Deutscher" isnt a name for a person and Ehrenreich is apperently a name so seems legit

Just now, Jakob Isringhausen said:

Since I am not German, it is hard for me to know what combination that is or is not FailRP. I just wanted to follow the German name rules so I chose two names from the Wikipedia-site. I don't know how much you expect from a non-German-speaking-person.

well you know that at least the word "Reich" isnt a name for a person. Next time just put those things into google translator especially if the word ends with Reich what is absolutly no name for a person

 Neutral
Your application is very well written and your answers are detailed. I would go differently on some situations like

On 9/8/2020 at 10:57 PM, Alastair said:

1 ) You are told by a player in admin chat that another player is randomly killing people:
I would first take a look at any damage logs available and search for the name of the player given in admin chat. If there is damage being done I would then, if possible, spectate the player and watch what they are doing to see if it is possible to catch them in the act of RDMing.

If the player is RDMing, the player should be brought to a location so an admin sit can be conducted. The offending player should then be warned/banned depending on whether the killings can be deemed accidental or intentional. If the player being watched is mass RDMing, they should either be frozen or kicked pending a ban, or just straight up banned on the spot depending on how many people they've already killed.

If the player wasn't RDMing, a case could be made to warn the person who sent the message in the admin chat as it could be possible they are attempting to get someone in trouble for doing something they are not.

I would ask for evidence aswell, if you cant catch him in the act of RDMing for example. But tbh I would tp first to the accusor and ask him his side of the story and if the evidence given I would bring he accused and so on... But otherwise your answer is still good in my opinion.

Overall your application was well thought and you took your time, its also good that you were staff once so you have lots of experience and can advice newer staff members, but the only problem I have rn is that I dont know you. Maybe its just me but I never seen you on the discord writing something before, so just let us get to know you more to really judge on this staff application. Still so people can get to know you better I would advice you to write some posts on the forums and try to interact with people on discord. 

 

14 minutes ago, Erich Krüger said:

Can't quite remember whether you were around when Erika dumpstered the ORPO in her attempt to get Staff and it basically had to be rebuilt from scratch, or when Mattis was appointed Deputy Gauleiter (which is more powerful than most Staff positions) by Tom "Simpin'" Agen. I know you definitely were not around when Scarlett spent her time DM'ing half her CO's asking for promotions and essentially promising she would send nudes to them if they promoted her

I mean yes you are right, this is a very disguisting statistic, but still I think in the trial time we can see if she proves herself to be a good staff or not, also you shouldnt compare people only based on their gender.

+1

Well  I also believe some individuals or groups have benefitted her because she is a girl, but I dont think Barberi is one of them so if she is getting promoted to CO than she at least knows a bit of what she is doing. 
Also the server wouldnt  collapse when she is staff as you described , so stay as professional as you should with 6 years of experience

3 hours ago, Erich Krüger said:

To the prospective self-sabotaging person that even considers accepting this, continue down this slippery slope on your own peril. I'm sure me and 90% of the server will be there when you have to backtrack so we can make fun of you

If she gets accepted she is given a trial time for one week and if she is really so bad as you think, than it will show in that trial time but what can one week do wrong. And I was a long time her CO in Orpo so I do think she can take things seriously if she wants to, so if she really wants to become staff I have no doubt she can do her job with the required seriosness and dedication as she should. 

+1
Very big +1 as I know him from Orpo when he was just a little Unterwachtmeister, but even then he showed much dedication and maturity so he ranked up fast. Also I believe his current rank underlines his reliability. I think he will do well as staff as he has good experience on the server and he understands the rules. 
His application is well written and full of details and his reasoning why he should be staff instead of other applicants is aswell very convincing.
Anyway good luck to you !'

And Walther Schacht, stop with those replies with only 1 word, its absolutly not helpful  so explain why you are giving him a +1 

-1 

well Inspektor Willrick is right tbh, I saw some changes, but they are so small so it doesent really matter tbh.
If you get denied because you staff application wasnt well enough, I would recommend not copy pasting nearly 90 % of it. So if you would be so dedicated that you say in the "why do you deserve staff more than other applicants" than you would´ve re-written at least some of it. 

+1 

On 8/20/2020 at 10:41 PM, rhino said:

I would firstly take the claim and teleport the victim to an OOC section so I do not interrupt other people's RP, after that I would proceed to ask the victim his side of story and ask him what happened. After that I would teleport the supposed "rdmer" into the sit as well and ask them their side of the story. After hearing both of their stories I would then proceed to check the logs see if this person actually RDMed someone for no reason. If this person did kill someone without a reason then I would have to give him a punishment that is suitable from the punishment list, if he lies about not killing someone for no reason and it shows up on the logs then I would also have to warn him for lying and give him an even bigger punishment that is suitable from the punishment list. If the person did not randomly killed someone then I would remind the victim to try and record or take a screenshot of the person that is breaking the rules. After the situation is done I would then proceed to teleport them both back to the in character area. If the rdmer proceeds to leave the sit within being brought or before being brought the I would have to give this person a ban for leaving to avoid punishment and RDMing as well as taking a screenshot of the logs so that I have proof if he decides to make a ban appeal.

ok I would ask them for evidence like screenshots or preferebly video evidence, also dont give him an even bigger punishment than suitable from the punishment list because those are the punishments so you should stick with them, you could also warn him for wasting your time aswell as lying to staff as there was no rdm in that situation.
 

On 8/20/2020 at 10:41 PM, rhino said:

I would firstly teleport them to a place where RP isn't happening and I would proceed to ask him what faction he is interested on joining, if he doesn't know any faction on the server then I would proceed to tell them what each faction is and what they do and etc. After telling what each faction does I would then ask him again what faction he is interested on joining. For example if he wants to join OTA, I would tell him that that job is only for VIP+ and he would have to pay real life money in order to play as well as applying to be OTA in our HL2 discord server which I would also link it to him. And lastly I would ask him if there is anything he would like to know more about or does he have any more questions regarding this topic if not then I would teleport them back to in character area and move on.

Seems good but I think OTA is picked out of Civil Protection if I am not mistaken and if the server is up he has to apply for CP IC and not on the discord server but the rest seems good.

 

On 8/20/2020 at 10:41 PM, rhino said:

I would tell the person that is not willing to RP to knock it off and start RPing properly or else I would tell their Hierarchy about this specific person's behavior on how he is not willing to RP seriously. I would not give this person a punishment or a warning since I am not apart of his faction so technically I do not have the right to remove or revoke his rank. But if this person does starts to do something against the rules then I would have to give this person a punishment that is suitable for him in the punishment list.

If the person ( that depends on the situation ) , does something like that I would give him a warning for failRP and send evidence of his missbehavior to his hierarchy, so you can punish him for failrp IF he does something against RP.

 

On 8/20/2020 at 10:41 PM, rhino said:

I would firstly go into the "SOD" job and teleport to the person that is prop spamming and start removing his props until it's all gone and then I would proceed to teleport him into an OOC area and tell him to knock it off and give him a warning for prop spamming and after that I would teleport him back to IC and I would start spectating this person for a couple of minutes just to see if he proceeds to prop spam or if he is willing to stop. If he does proceed to prop spam again I would teleport him into an OOC area again and this time I would give him a punishment that is suitable from the punishment list.

Well you dont need to go into the SOD job but suit yourself but prop  spamming is perma ban , but you couldnt really know as the punishment list isnt public yet, but you could´ve looked at the NRP punishment list as they dont have a huge diffrence.

 

On 8/20/2020 at 10:41 PM, rhino said:

Tier I rule-breaking and punishment means when a new player joins the server and proceeds to break a rule then it would count as Tier I rule breaking since this specific player has just joined recently or has a low playtime for example less than two hours or so. This player will receive a Tier I punishment, a Tier I punishment is a lighter punishment, this punishment could be something such as warning or a kick. For Tier I rule-breaking and punishment, this means that this player has been warned before for breaking a specific rule and continues to break them after receiving a warn for it. Tier I rule-breaking is often given to players that are already experienced on the server or that have been playing on the server for a decent amount of time. Tier II punishment is much harsher than a Tier I punishment. This punishment can consist of a short ban or a long ban depending on how bad they broke the rules. A short ban could probably last between 1-3 days, as for a long ban it can last between 1-2 weeks depending if they keep breaking the rules. If they managed to reach more than 10+ warns they could possible be receiving a really really long ban or worse a permanent ban which is the last resort for them. 

Short version : Tier I = accidental or when a new player had no ruleknowledge  and Tier II = its not an accident and the player knew he is breaking the rules or if he is a veteran player 


The rest seems fine, so to come to an end I mean you still have some smaller mistakes but you applied for the second time, that shows dedecation, so even though you made some mistakes I would defenetly give you a chance to prove yourself as staff. You did what I wrote under the last application, to write on the discord so people get to know you so now I am giving you a  +1 

Good luck to you anyway

- 1 

19 hours ago, malnjayz said:

1 ) You are told by a player in admin chat that another player is randomly killing people: I would observer the player that is supposedly doing so, if it is in a massively disruptive matter I would intervent, however if he is properly RPing I would tell the reporting player to inform Civil Protection about it so they can handle it In-Character

Ehm no this is handled OOC as RDM is  FailRP as he is randomly killing people what makes it an OOC situation. You would take the accusor into a sit and ask him what happend, than ask for evidence and look and the logs to see what happend, than bring the accused and ask him what happend ( short version what you could do ) and if he was RDMing than warn him for RDM and dont take it IC
 

19 hours ago, malnjayz said:

3 ) You catch somebody not performing RP and messing around: If he is performing uncivil behaviour I would warn him verbally IC, if he doesnt stop I report him to CP and if he is getting imprisoned I would tp to him to make sure he knows which rule he broke.

Its your job to punish people for OOC rulebreaking not CP, I think you dont get what staff is, dont take OOC things IC, this is a serious server so we want that everyone is RPing serious.
 

19 hours ago, malnjayz said:

4 ) Somebody acquires a rank but is not willing to RP with it properly: (i assume, "he is not willing to RP with it properly" means someone already tried talking to him about his behaviour)I report it to whoever is his Superior, so they can handle his behaviour In-Character.

You could warn him for FailRP as he is not RP properly but yeah this time you can report it as it is an OOC and IC situation
 

19 hours ago, malnjayz said:

5 ) A player is prop spamming: I would verbally warn the player to stop doing it, if I see him continuing it I would warn him using !warn.

Yeah you cant know the rules, so its a bit unfair but you could´ve just have a look at the NRP rules and punishments where you would´ve seen its a perma ban

 

19 hours ago, malnjayz said:

1 ) Explain the difference between Tier I rule-breaking and punishments and Tier II rule-breaking and punishments: Tier I rule-breaking and punishments include minor rule breakings, for breaking rules like that the offending person will be warned verbally before other staffing matters would be taken. Tier II rule-breaking and punishments however will have an immediate punishment after the rule-breaking offence.

Ok Tier I is if it was accidential or if the accused didnt know it was a rule , Tier II is when it wasnt an accident and the accused knows exactly what he has done and that it was a rule ( in really short terms ) 

To come to an end  you had several things wrong by taking OOC things into IC punishment  aswell as some smaller things like Tier 1 an Tier 2, you couldve read the NRP or SWRP rules as I dont think there is a huge diffrence between them. Keep in mind that this is a serious server. And tbh I dont know you really well so it would be a + point if the community gets to know you and not only for playing the beta. 

But anyway good luck to you

 

13 hours ago, Evilgejf said:

Bruh some people dont read replies cause they are special. +1 Overall good if u complain about Plagurism then u just acting like a baby since its obvious wuts happening. Also everything been stated above

I mean it stands on Requirenments, and he is not fulfilling that so end of the story .     Also I bet he did not asked Mojave to copy his text

+1 
I know him for a long time in Orpo and he always was a very dedicated and competent person. He is absolutly trust worthy and deals with complicated situation with maturity and professionalism, also he is very active ( or he was when I was still on the server ) and his IC rank shows that he is very reliable and understands how rules work as the Gestapo is very strict with them.

Good luck to you.

-1 
Even in the template stands under requirenments 

"- You must not copy anything from other applications."

and as we see you do not fulfill this requirenment its a big -1 and tbh I dont even have to say more