Viktor Svetsken

User was already banned permanently for another reason. Therein, this thread is unnecessary and will be locked soon.

No previous records of you being selected for Trial phase? (Referenced in your 'Previous Staff Experience section) Stated by the two posts above, this was advertised and proof has been given to support this claim. This is not only against the in-game/community rules, this is frowned upon in general. The section "What is SCP-RP about" while not containing purely job descriptions, it's close to call such. Some others may have a different take on this but for now I am going to have to give a negative verdict. -1 Best of luck! -Viktor

User will be unbanned this morning as their 2 days are up. Further activity on this thread is not necessary.

Hello! I am the one who banned you unfortunately. Since I was the one who banned you, I might as well give you my sight on the situation as to why you were banned. - Not too long after I escaped the Foundation as a Class-D, I saw you minging around the PD front entrance. When told by PD to leave multiple times, you refused to which no avail got you shot a couple times. - As time went on, you switched jobs to SCP-939 after being killed as 016-2. (Your model was also broken during this time as you were showing up and 016-2, not 939) - During this time, I got 6 sits regarding your case back to back. First time around was regarding the fact that you were harming people and constantly running out of your CC without Breach Permissions. I told you (in text chat) along with multiple players who weren't staff (before I was even called on the case) to stop breaking this fairly simple rule. You kept breaking it so I warned you and moved on as you had stopped from then on. - No longer than 4 minutes later, I get yet another sit regarding your case to which I claimed. I TP'd, asked you to stop like before like the 4 other players alongside me and you didn't stop. You kept FalseBreaching and harming people out of your CC with no valid reason behind it. - The result of this, well you can guess. It resulted in your 2-day ban. You failed to listen to staff multiple times regarding the FailBreach and the minging very early on in my situation with you. Other players had also given you a warning as to what rules you were breaking before I got there, so you had a fair chance to stop breaking them. I would highly suggest reading the rules next time so you can avoid being punished like this for something so simple to avoid. I am sincerely sorry this had to happen, but rules are rules and it is my duty to enforce them. Please check up on the rules regularly to ensure you aren't in violation of them! Ruleset for SCP-RP v6: Note: The other active instance of SCP-939 was also telling you to stop. Best of luck -Viktor

+1 Wouldn't see why not, you edited your app to exceed the word count which is what made me iffy at first. Other than a small incident, never had any bad experiences with you in-game. You seem fit for the team. Best of luck! -Viktor

Yes

KEKW

+1 Great app along with a fantastic event plan. Good interactions with the user Should be given a shot at this.

Thank you for clearing this up. My verdict for this application is -1

@Didde This is the applicant's warning list

Neutral Going to stay neutral here as I am unsure of who you are and haven't had any RP interactions with you as of yet. This is a decent app however the Containment procedure is wrong. I wish you the best of luck! -Viktor

Neutral/+1 While I have only just now started seeing you around on the server, I can't say that any of my interactions with you were negative. You've good a good app here and I wouldn't see why you shouldn't be given a chance. Best of luck! -Viktor

I don't really have anything to say about this. My friend, you are going to be denied with an app like this, I'm sorry. -1

+1 Never seen ya in game personally but I believe you'd be alright. App is alright, just a few details are missing is all and playtime is a bit scary. No problems with this app otherwise.

Which Rank/tag do you need: SCP-RP Administrator What is your RP Name on the server(only use one): Viktor Svetsken Evidence (A image of your name ingame with the said rank, or a image of yourself on the old forum. Do not post sensitive information such as emails/PayPal payments please:

Neutral/+1 App is pretty good to me. Could do with a touch up in very select places. Your playtime/presence is the only thing that kinda scares me. (As you have acknowledged.) Therefore, I haven't seen you in terms of RP personally. I do believe you show potential for the whitelist and understand the rules behind it, but do remember that you will be watched closely as 096 should you be accepted by Olli. Best of luck! -Viktor

Personal Verdict: Neutral Reasons: This app just seems to have a little less to it compared to some others, however it has potential I personally have not seen you within the server but I do trust you understand the basics of 1048. Best of luck! - Viktor

[BASIC INFORMATION] Your In-Game Name: Viktor Svetsken (Agent Baron while on duty as MTF) Your Steam-ID: STEAM_0:1:242419537 Your Age: 18 Your In-Game Playtime: 2w 4d 5h 18m Your amount of warnings (15 Warnings max): No warnings as of writing this (Don't plan on changing that) Rate your roleplaying skills: Personally I would rate myself 8.5 to 9 out of 10. Other users may think differently but we shall see. [BASIC QUESTIONS/IMPORTANT Questions] What would you like your O5 Designation to be?: Why do you believe you should be part of the O5 Council and what can you bring to the role e.g (Pressure in extreme situations, making the tough decisions): I believe that I should be a part of the O5 Council for the sole reason that I will deliver top of the line operational security and efficiency to the table. Personally I have had the experiences of leading and devising teams to reach a mutual objective in a short time with maximum efficiency without fail. I will ensure that the site runs at optimal levels with extreme measures to ensure everything stays in check. This includes Containment, Site personnel protocol enforcement, Conduct within the site and the overall security of it. I will also seek to go on the offensive when it comes to possible attackers of the Foundation. The Foundations security and secrets are of utmost importance and they are not to be compromised, therefore I will ensure that all defensive and offensive plays are made to perfection. I can bring many plays to the table in terms of absolute security and confidentiality to the Council, I must however be able to act on them directly as intended. I will of course run these plans over with fellow Council members, getting their input and ultimately making a decision on a plan of mine. I will listen to fellow Council members and their opinions. I wish to be a part of the Council to be able to bring my skill set in terms of team leadership and wits behind certain situations. I can handle myself extremely well under pressure and I can come to a reasonable decision when it comes to making even the toughest of decisions. It comes down to the most logical answer to the problem and the most efficient solution. My decision making can be spot on at most times and I will continue this into the Council without fail and with just as much effectiveness as of now. How many O5 Council Members are their in the SCP universe that are known but not on record?: Known in the SCP universe, there are O5s with designations ranging from 1-13. There is a shroud of mystery behind the elusive O5-13 however. In terms to the Council, O5-13 doesn't exist. O5-13 is used as a tie-breaker and used when there is a 50/50 vote between the council members. When the tie appears in a case, a cycle of Council members starting from 1 to 12 is used in every case. One member is chosen in a constant, looped order (1, then 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, etc.) to make another vote to break the tie within the total votes. Other than that, the rest are designated by a number (being 1-12) and some sort of designated codename ("Prestige", "Founder", etc.) all while remaining highly anonymous to those around them on site. Can you explain what an O5 does for the foundation and the site itself and why he himself differs from any other site Adminstration?: The O5 provides operational integrity to the Site they are active on without fail and with absolute efficiency and secrecy. The O5 himself differs from all other Site Administration as they have total authority over the entirety of the Foundation and have access to means that no one else does. This includes: Site Lockdown, Ability to launch the nuke should a/multiple SCP(s) breach to the surface, authority to order certain things to be done within the facility (to a reasonable extent), etc. The access to resources is limitless to the O5 as long it is within reasonable limits to make use of them. With the resources at hand, they can bring a swift solution into sight should a problem arise unlike the other Site Administration, who don't have the means to access those types of resources. In all technicality, a site without the O5 being present is a dangerous place. A site without an acting O5 is not only potentially leaving the site without proper resources to deal with critical situations, it's leaving the site without someone to make the correct calls in certain situations. The point in having an O5 on site is so the site is maintained in terms of security and integrity. If we were to put myself into a reality where I was an acting O5 then we can run through a couple of situations. Let's say an SCP breaches, the first thing on my agenda is to initiate a Site Lockdown. After locking down the site, I would ask someone to Initiate Lockdown Procedure on Glass Gate. Afterwards, move to secure location in which the SCP can't access with my protection detail. In the event of a Massive Raid situation, I would order for local armed units to take care of the intruders. The scale of the intrusion can sometimes dictate the lockdown call. (In my personal opinion, a Raid Lockdown should be implemented when the confirmed raider count is 5+.) Move to a secure area with my protection detail and request constant updates on the situation all while ordering their arrest or termination if proven to be a raider. Without the O5, the potential for SCPs breaching to the surface or mass raids happening without any consequence to them is massive as other Site Administration don't have access to the resources that the O5 does. This is how the O5 differs from the rest. Explain what makes you special: I believe what makes me special is my impartiality and my decision making. I can make decisions with absolute logic and make them effectively without having a second thought if it comes to give off a positive result. My ability to know when something is good to make a play on and something isn't good to touch at all is known among a few. (Having played Site Administration in the past) I know what decisions must be made when it comes to certain situations and I will employ special tactics and protocols to enforce those decisions should they require such solution. I also feel that my leadership skill is known in times of need when there is a situation in need of someone to take control. I always try and take the initiative when those situations arise and I plan on doing so within the Council should I be accepted into it. How do you initiate a nuke?: In order to initiate a nuke, you must contact Hierarchy and explain to them the reason for your call to initiate the nuke. Hierarchy will then vote on the fact if your reason to launch the nuke is valid or invalid. In the case your reason is valid, the nuke will be launched. (This does not mean you are in the clear however) In the situation that the nuked is launched and Hierarchy find out that the reason was actually invalid, you can get in trouble for MRDM. This will result in you being kicked and blacklisted from O5. What are the rules a O5 Council member has to follow?: The rules the O5 must follow are simple: 1: Never risk your life under any circumstances 2: Never go near any SCP containment areas in the case that a breach happens 3: Do NOT go anywhere near D-Block and the ones who inhabit it (Class-D Personnel). 4: Have a valid reason for any course of action that you set in motion. It's not like the O5 to go around ordering pointless things like random terminations or launching the nuke just because a Class-D got on the surface 5: Always be prepared; Be ready to initiate lockdown in the case of a massive raid or in the case of an SCP breaching their containment. You must have a valid reason to do these actions however as stated as it can be frowned upon by the Council for using resources where unnecessary. Why would you like to role play as an O5?: I would like to role play as the O5 to ensure the order of the Facility so there are no problems regarding the security of the Site as a whole. I wish to bring a leader upon the people so they have someone they can go to when they are looking for insight. I wish to help those among the site by protecting them and ensuring everything is secure. Notes: My Site Administration time may be iffy at the time but I will state for the record that I have played my share of time on Site Administration in the past and understand the risk that comes with playing it. I will live up to the expectations that are set in front of me.

This user has a different thread being used for the same problem. If this thread could be locked by Forum Administration, please.

This user has a different thread being used for the same problem. If this thread could be locked by Forum Administration, please.

Not a valid reason to kill Class-D while you are also playing as one. You use that on Security, not on your own. Also for the record, you killed 6.

Now this. This right here. This is peak comedy. -1 otherwise. Reasons have been stated above. Unofficial +1 for using template though.

@Mp6_Zephyr Here's the problem with your case You can really only tell them to clear out the D-Block Airlock. The room(s) past that don't follow the same rule "If you count down and they're still there, you can shoot em" The only reason you can entirely shoot them beyond that airlock is if a Class-D initiates combat with you. This means if they run at you with a knife after being told to stop or they attack you with said knife, then you can shoot. Basic Rules of Engagement. The Evidence shown above by @Clint Westbrook shows that you killed them within the very room in which "counting down from 5" is not accepted. All you can really do is ask them to clear the room or cuff them to bring them out of the room. Doesn't mean they need to comply/respond as you are in their territory once you pass that second set of airlock doors. Best of luck! -Viktor

@Olli Sivonen This is very similar to the "Playtime: Yes" that we saw a while ago.

+1 from me - Good lad - I haven't seen you do anything bad personally - You seem like you'd fit well.