Schnee

I know you from 501st and you are an active and nice guy, but this isn't the main reason you should get accepted, the main reason is your application and your leadership. I can´t really say anything about your leadership in general, but I think that you are a dedicated guy who always wants the best for the regiment and its members. Comming to your application, the application looks good and not rushed at all and in my opinion that shows that you really want to become a member of the battalion and dedicate yourself towards the standarts. I think you would be a decend member so I give you a +1 Good luck!

Kinda cringe, but yeah...

Ok so, I read your staff app and I come to the conclusion to give you a -1 The first reason is that your staff application seems for me to be a bit rushed, the evidence is in the application, you forgot to add the "Why should you be staff" question. (You have it now tho after Dimmy told you) And you did not defined what OOC means / is. So I think you rushed the application and you didn´t checked if everything is there / correct. The second reason why I give you a -1 is that the answeres are thin, not detailed and some of them are wrong, e.g this question: So you said here that you would give someone who RDMed others a 2 days ban for MRDM, really? When you have someone who has been MRDMing he would get a permanent ban and not just a two days ban. You explained what you would wrong, in this case you can´t just check the logs and ban him, Jail TP him to an admin sit area and talk to him why he even did it, if he says that he did it just for fun he did MRDM and he clearly shows NITRP, and that is a permanent ban. So, I think you aren´t ready for staff yet, you can try it again soon and I hope you will give yourself more time with writing this application.

Ok so, I just read your application and now I will give you my opinion on it. The Application Let me start with the first part of the application, the general information part. You had to explain the story of City-24 and the HL Universe with 150+ words, but unfortunately you only wrote 123 words (according to a word counter), and that means that you didn´t reached the requirement which is kinda sad, because the rest is very detailed and correct. Let me move on to the situations So, here you said that you would ban someone for 1 week for breacking RDM, an RDM sit can me multiple situations, so in this case it depends on the situation if you would give him a one week ban for RDM, a Tier I or a Tier II Warn / Ban / Kick (Depends on the punishments list which isn´t out yet), but in my opinion a one week ban for one guy RDMing another guy is a bit too much, but of course it depends on the situation and on the warns he already got, I will give you an example. 1. If the guy only RDMed someone without knowing the rules, I would check if he already has a warn for RDM, if he doesn´t has a warn, I would give him a Tier I Warn and a Rule kick, so he can read the rules and come back when he knows them. 2. If the guys RDMed someone I would do the same, check his warns, and if he already has a warn for RDM Tier I, then I would give him a Tier II warning and a ban for 1/2 days. In situation 2 I gave him a Tier II because, when he already got a Tier I warning for RDM, that means that he already knows the rules and the fact that he addmited RDM. But the situations can also have a different outcome, depending on what the guy did. The rest of question 1 was answered very good and detailed, which his good. You answered that question very good, but it isn´t 100% decided yet how someone can join e.g the CP, perhaps they have to go as a citizen to the Nexus and ask for an interview. I hope more information on that will be given soon. But the answer you gave was good aswell. The answers given in question 3 and 4 are good, but if someone is clearly not willing to RP he is not doing FailRP, he doing NITRP = no intention to roleplay and that is not a 1d ban, a NITRP Tier I warn + ban is more likely a 1 week ban and a NITRP Tier II can be a few weeks to a permanent ban. The answer is correct, if someone if prop spamming he should always get a permanent ban or a NITRP ban, but it also depends on the number of props he spawned / spammed. You answered question 6-9 correct, there is nothing for me to say. Moving on to the definition. In my opinion you defined everything correct, so there is not anything for me to say aswell. To sum everything up, I will give you a +1 / Small Neutral The +1 becasue of the detail and the answeres. The Small Neutral because you didn´t wrote 150+ here. I think you would be a very good addition for the staff team. Good luck!

+1 Rex has lots of knowledge and is a very active member of the server. Good luck Rex!

+1 Your application looks very good, you explained everything in detail and you didn´t rushed it. You would be a good addition to the staff team, good luck!

+1 The staff application looks very good, you only answered a few things in an wrong way. E.g the question with the RDMer, you don´t check the logs when the guy who made the sit doesn´t has any evidence, you always have to check the logs in these kind of situation. One thing that I also noticed is that you said thatyou would only give the prop spammer a warning, but you need to know that if you see someone spaming props in any way, you have to give him most likely a permanent ban, depending on the situation. Anyways, I think you would be a good member in the staff team, Good luck!

+1 / Neutral The application looks good, the questions have been answered correct and your time on the server is decend, I gave you a neutral because you are still a NCO and some people might not really know you. Anyways, good luck

Neutral / +1 The application itself is fine, the reason I give you a neutral is, because you only have one week of playtime on the server

-1 / Neutral The application seems to be rushed and some of the answeres are incorrect. The others already told you the things you could improve. Anyways, good luck!

+1 The staff application is well written and all questions are answered correctly, but some are a bit thin and in relation to question 5 with the prop spammer you said you would warn him, but the server is strictly serious RP and a prop- Spammers will most likely get a permanent ban instead of just a warning for the first time

+1 The application you made is well written and it doesn't seems like you rushed it, you took your time and the result is very good. In my opinion you would be a nice addition to the staff team. Good luck!

Which Rank/tag do you need: Ultimate Supporter Tag What is your RP Name on the server(only use one): Marc Schnee Evidence:

+1 Staff application looks good and you are a active and experienced guy Good luck!

+1 / Neutral Ok, so you are a nice and active person on the server but the staff application seems a little bit rushed for me with the answered and the organization. But I still wish you best of luck!