AlexMagus

sarkic

You did it... You escaped Tarkov.

it has been confirmed that lizz truss and harland kill quen

Is it because Norra likes it when someone talks to it in a dominant way so it knows it's place?

alex magus
remove tag
sadly i was demoted from werwolfgaming scprp for smt decision and Constant complaints from past SMT members, dev team members and current SMT members about your behaviour and attitude 😞

[BASIC INFORMATION]
In-Game Name: Alex Magus
STEAM ID: STEAM_0:0:171534768
Current In-Game time: 6 days, 12 hours 😤
Current Warnings ( Show a screenshot of
your warns in game): 1 warning, FailRP - From 2019

[IMPORTANT INFORMATION]
1. Please list the first 3 roles of Ethics Committee and what it is they do as part of the foundation and Site Administration?*
a) Advisors
To be an Ethics Committee Member is to be an advisor to the Foundation Administration. Ethics Committee Members have the morality out of the foundation, and will use this skill to help them in their duties. As an advisor, an ECM will watch over what a member of the FA does and ensure what they're doing is ethical and moral. If it isn't, they will advise on how to change it if it hasn't been done already.
b) Inspectors
As member of the Ethics Committee, inspections should be done on the regular. They must inspect fairly, ensuring all ethical procedures are in effect. The EC observes, they do not order. If they find something wrong, it must be corrected else the Facility may face accidents, breaches and other. 
c) Judges
The Ethics Committee judge members of the foundation during trials or their detainment periods. Whether they be a O5 Council Member or a CL1 janitor, an ECM will judge them just the same based on what their charges are, without any bias. 
2. Can you explain the 3 Lessons of the ethics committee and why they are important?*
a) The SCP Foundation is not evil.
SCP:F is not evil. We are neutral. The Ethics Committee exists to combat the evil tumors within the foundation, as 'evil' is defined by extremely immoral and heinous acts. The Foundation may interrogate, amnesticate and incriminate but that is to ensure the safety and security of reality.
b) 'P' is for protect, along with 'S' and 'C'
Along with Secure and Contain, we must Protect. Protection is important, as without it then there would be no reason for us to exist. The Foundation exists to protect. Security and containment are only 2/3 of the Foundation. Through all 3, they become the Foundation that secures, contains and protects. Securing reality, Containing anomalies, Protecting innocents.
c) We do not rule the world.
We could, but we don't. It is not our goal. The Foundation sticks by the motto of 'Secure. Contain. Protect.', and not sticking by it is a breach of foundation protocol. The Foundation aren't the secret super-billionaires that rule the world. We are not 'Providence' from the Hitman saga. We are those who hold reality from anarchy, those who puppeteer every government to our will.
3.  Why do you believe you should be accepted into the Ethics Committee?*
I believe I should be accepted because of the fact that I have a lot of lore knowledge about the SCP Universe, as well as a lot of knowledge of the law and rules that the Foundation has in place on the server. I believe I am fully unbias and moral enough to be able to fill the position as ECM, as well as be active in it. I currently hold the SD and HoEA whitelist, and most of my playtime has been on foundation administration jobs. 
I value morality, and will swear to upkeep it in my duties as an ECM without fail.
4.  Explain in detail what the SCP Facility is and why it is important.*
The SCP Facility is a facility in the SCP Foundation. The SCP Foundation and it's facilities are important because they house the most dangerous things known to reality. Anomalies. Anomalies have the capacity to destroy and create masses of reality at a time, depending on their power, and without the SCP Foundation a lot of these anomalies that can cause mass extinction events would be let loose. 
If there was no SCP Foundation, there would be mass panic.. SCPs would fill the streets causing havoc, or maybe just happiness. Even without the Foundation, there would be a pseudo-foundation made by the Governments to secure the anomalies, contain them and protect their citizens. It would be just like the foundation.
5. If you are playing Ethics Committee and a situation has occurred with the O5 being  unethical and unlawful by ordering mass executions of high ranking members, what would you do?
I'd have the O5 council member detained, telling the O5 Council Chairman about the behaviour while then informing the Ethics Committee Executive Chairman. I'd host a trial for the O5 Council Member, and whatever the verdict may be, we shall give that punishment, unless stopped by the Executive Chairman of the Ethics Committee or Chairman of the O5 Council.
6.  You hear that the Site Director and Head Reseracher have been abusing the powers of the SCPs on site(such ass 500 and 2295), what do you do? Who was drunk when they writ this question
I'd have the SD and HR brung to an office space if it was minor, or the cells if severe. I'd tell them that what they're doing is unethical and wrong, as abusing the SCPs can lead to catastrophic outcomes, even if the act is small. If they were majorly abusing the SCPs, I'd have them detained for about 10 minutes in MTF Custody. If minorly, a verbal warning.
7. You witness 2 Researchers wasting D-Class by throwing them into  SCP-106 for "Feeding", what do you do?
Detain them, if they're Junior Researchers I'd inform them not to do it again or they'd be demoted to service personnel. If Senior, I'd demote them to Junior. If Head Researcher, I'd report them to the Director of Research and demote them to Junior Researcher. I'd also inform them that it is immoral to waste Human life, as SCP-106 does not need 'feeding', whether it says so or not.
8. While on duty a breach occurs and you have the time and option of opening 1 of 2 gates to save someone from an incoming SCP, on 1 side is a fellow ECM and O1 unit and on the other 5 junior researchers, what gate do you open and why?
5 Junior Researchers would most likely waste more lives in the future, while an ECM and O1 Unit saving more. An ECM and O1 unit is harder to replace than 5 Junior Researchers. Morality would tell us to save more lives, as all are equal and the more lives the better. But is that true? In a split second decision, I would pick the ECM and O1 unit due to their future in assisting in saving lives and protecting them. Junior Researchers are usually only testing on minor SCPs on minor things, and I don't see much of a future for them, but choosing 1 can change everything. Hierarchy and importance is not a problem here, as everyone must be judged based on their morals, future and equipment not their rank.
 

Denied,
broke Rules on the server recently.

Done.

alex magus
remove tag
sadly i was demoted from werwolfgaming scprp for smt decision and Constant complaints from past SMT members, dev team members and current SMT members about your behaviour and attitude 😞

alex magus
remove tag
sadly i was demoted from werwolfgaming scprp for smt decision and Constant complaints from past SMT members, dev team members and current SMT members about your behaviour and attitude 😞

Your application for site director has been ACCEPTED
Meh app but have experience and support.
O5-5 "The Survivor"
(Contact nathan.#6322)

i hate class d

i hate class d

Your In-game name: Alex Finn Schmidt
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:177693302
 
Reason of the warning: Seen below
Date you were warned on: Multiple
Admin who warned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Frank Widmer
 
Explain the situation of your warning from your point of view in detail: N/A
Do you think your warning was justified: Yes.
 
Why should I be unwarned: I have changed. These were all years ago, my last warn was a month ago- it was a warn, not a ban.  As the reason that it was so iffy that it couldn't really be my fault. Before that, my last warn was 4 months before that warn. They were so long ago I can not even remember the details around them, I also believe the 3 year rule should be applied here.
 
Any kind of evidence: 
Additional information:

Your In-game name: Axel Klaus
Your Steam ID(in format:STEAM_#:#:#########): STEAM_0:0:526797816
 
Reason of the ban: Ask big man Erich its a lot 
Date you were banned on: 18/8/21
Duration of ban: Perm
Admin who banned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Erich Von Wiegland
 
Explain the situation of your ban from your point of view in detail: Ohh it was a long stormy night in germany when a Resistance member got falsely accused of a Break in within a car :0 Then i call them Nazis and jump in cuffs (They do not like that) Erich I love you  
Do you think your ban was justified: NO
Why should you be unbanned: I love Erich, Erich agrees that I should be unbanned if I give him a tesco meal deal
 
Any kind of evidence: 
 
Additional information: Erich said Nazis like this song
 

I was literally friends with the original shoeshiner, and even he agreed that y'all were a minge group smh smh smh

ok +1 good player and things
 
cons - from uae

ok +1 good player and things
 
cons - from uae

Locked, Positions are full.

Accepted,
sure ....... just beaware that you have quiet a few warns on your account already, so if you break any Rules it may lead directly to a ban.

Denied, does not meet requirements

Oh my god, Mr Nandor. We are so incredibly sorry that we have permanently banned you, and I personally believe that you should be unbanned solely due to your most significant stature, and that if you're gone, who the hell will streamline the NEXT generation!?

Once again I offer my utmost apology to you and your feelings, due to the fact that they have been so damaged due to this abhorrent decision made by one of our staff members. I hope that you will get the counselling that you need to help you through this trying time.

Oh my god, Mr Nandor. We are so incredibly sorry that we have permanently banned you, and I personally believe that you should be unbanned solely due to your most significant stature, and that if you're gone, who the hell will streamline the NEXT generation!?

Once again I offer my utmost apology to you and your feelings, due to the fact that they have been so damaged due to this abhorrent decision made by one of our staff members. I hope that you will get the counselling that you need to help you through this trying time.

Oh my god, Mr Nandor. We are so incredibly sorry that we have permanently banned you, and I personally believe that you should be unbanned solely due to your most significant stature, and that if you're gone, who the hell will streamline the NEXT generation!?

Once again I offer my utmost apology to you and your feelings, due to the fact that they have been so damaged due to this abhorrent decision made by one of our staff members. I hope that you will get the counselling that you need to help you through this trying time.

DENIED

Council have voted majority against you at this time please try again later