Maurice D Biggs

Accepted.

Accepted.

Accepted.

Accepted.

Accepted, invalid Ban reason.

Accepted, invalid Ban reason.

You have litterally admitted to me/Oswald, that the way you play, you break RDM constantly, you have not understood the point of an RP Server, or simply ignored it, you will not be unbanned any time soon.

Approved, kinda
Ban will be lowered to 1 month.

Accepted
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

So in English stuff may be implied, depending on context.
If someone says "Can you not do X" (and that person is someone above you) - then normally this also means "Do not do X" and not "You can do X, but I don't want you to".
 
This is same kind of logic saying "You can do X when Y" actually means "You can only do X, if Y happens", and not "If Y happens, you may do X".
If someone writes something like "in HCZ/LCZ", it is for a reason, nobody just adds random words to a ruleset, just because they feel like it.
 
Arguing on "Technicallities" will not help you anywhere, it will only annoy Staff, and if you come with "Its not in the rules because it doesn't say 'only' ", then Staff are very likely to respond with "Well techniclly you should be given punishment X after the Punishment List" - which in mose cases is a harsher punishment.
So just .......... be nice .... not annoying.
 

You attempted to bypass your ban, so your chances of getting unbanned effectivly droped to 0.

 

You attempted to bypass your ban, so your chances of getting unbanned effectivly droped to 0.

 

I can't really blame you for not knowing, but I am actually part of the Staff Team, even if I have no Tag on Forum. Staff Spreadsheet - Security Staff
Since you seem to be happily claiming that all of it was "trivial" stuff, I will happily go over each warn with you ....... and explain the consequences these things actually have on the server, and why they are not trivial.
"FailRP - Body blocking as a researcher | NLR - Keeps going back to CDC to harass the same D Class"
I do not think I need to comment on this as this litterally states you were harrasing other Players.
"FailRP | Going to surface as medical staff, has done so as an SR before."
So 2 Issues here A: This warn states that you have done this before ( and I am assuming been verbally warned for it), so you have directly ignored what staff told you. B: If you would have ran into the Arms of CI ( which is not that unlikely) you would have easily became a Hostage, which would be a huge issue for Foundation as they would probably try to save you / pay for you ....................... which would probably include quiet a few players just needing to deal with that ..... just because you couldnt do your Job in RP.
"FailRP | Trying to release Class D's as a Researcher "
Do I even need to explain how trying to release D class is problematic?
Espcially since D class can get Guns outside D Block and then kill Foundation Staff ....... just cus you left them out cus you were bored?
"FailRP | Going into D block as a researcher to make a church in there"
This is the only warning I would actually say is maybe kinda harsh, but considering your record of FailRP Warns before I can understand why you were given it.
"[Permament Ban] Mass FailRP-NH2RP | 5 failRP warns in a week. Constantly going into D block to help D classes after being told not to multiple times."
And again Releasing D class ................ what do I even have to say?
 
Even if you think we are to strict ....... at the point where Staff told you to stop you should have stopped, its not like we forced you to stay.
 
 
Also there is a diffrence between having 6 warns ....... and getting 6 warns in this short amount of time.
You litterally gotten a warn on the 14th,17th,18th,19th,20th June ....... and the gap there seems to match up with the weekend, so I assume you just didn't play on the weekends?, if that is the case you litterally gotten a warn every single day ....... and if you didn't see a ban coming in that case then idk what you expected.

As far as I know, this has a 0 chance of being added.
The issue is that in GMod anything that has to do with Voice takes quiet abit of performance.
For context: even the Gag command for Staff has been removed due to this, so if not even a Staff command is important enougth for the performance loss, I do not think this will be.
 

You were banned on 3rd October 2020 for "Homophobia|DTS|DTP|NH2RP".
ULX lost some infomation about your Ban so it will display the current time as the Time of Ban (You need to adjust for Timezones)
 

So, PME is "Player Made Event", if SMT/Event Planner are informed and permit it ...... then it wouldnt make it PME anymore, so this suggestion is kinda useless.

There isnt even any actual evidence here that he was biased.
But he should have deffently sticked more to the Punishment List [Also I question if this is even a Tier 1, if isnt actually Tier 2 -> which can only be judged if there is an actual conversation with the Nu7 on why he did it].
But that is like a Temp Tier at max, and maybe just a reduction in performance.

Reading this entire Thread ................ I somehow didn't spot 1 attempt to explain what they would actually do on the server.