Maurice D Biggs

I think bassicly saying "people need to be active to not get kicked", when asked how you are going to make sure the Job doesn't die ..... is not anwsering the question.
No job ever had active members because of their Activity Requirement ........ you need to make sure people actually have something to do.
 

Even if its clearly not working, there still is an attempt to encourage RP, this just encourages being AFK.
If there is no testing at all going on, and there are allready 5 other SCPs, maybe you should be switching jobs instead of just staring at a Wall.
 

Maybe if you make an Unban request, you should include the fact that your Ban includes Mass FailRP - kinda a big deal you know.
From what I can tell you were banned because you multiple Staff Members saw you regularly FailRP/etc.
The ERP was just was the final thing which made multiple Staff Member say that you should just be banned.
I mean just yesterday you admitted in Chat to giving Comms to D Class ......... "keeping a close eye on your warns" .... yea right.
Also you not considering your verbal ERP Warn valid, is just laughable, normally thats instandly a normal warn.

The point that in Position like Staff, many people really want people they can trust, so many people expect apllicants to be well known.
I can only gueese this mentally is due to the History of the Server.
Obviously its an Issue that depends on which Jobs you play, if you play more Jobs in Positions of Power (O5,SD,HOEA,Commander Jobs.....), you will obviously get well known, if you play other Jobs, you may not get known aswell.
And at the end all of "+1 / -1" is just what Players think, we had Staff be accepted who got this negative Feedback,
so while being known certainly helps alot, its not nessairly needed.

Okay so first, anyone who just says "use common sense" clearly has no idea what they are talking about, if its not a listed reason, it would be RDM, even if Staff normally ignore it due to the ruleset being kinda stupid.
And if you read 1.14, you will notice that infact there is nothing allowing you to kill CI, armed or unarmed, unless they harm foundation personnel or are trepassing (aka if they raided bassiclly).
These Combat rules are from a long time ago, and they do not fit at all.
With these rules, you can in no situation ever, attack CI, unless they attacked you/foundation.
[Stop just claiming stuff like "common sense" just so you do not need to admit that the ruleset is just completely stupid]
There should be a entry added which allows you to kill players which are part of a group which is hostile to you if they are armed.
 

Okay so first, anyone who just says "use common sense" clearly has no idea what they are talking about, if its not a listed reason, it would be RDM, even if Staff normally ignore it due to the ruleset being kinda stupid.
And if you read 1.14, you will notice that infact there is nothing allowing you to kill CI, armed or unarmed, unless they harm foundation personnel or are trepassing (aka if they raided bassiclly).
These Combat rules are from a long time ago, and they do not fit at all.
With these rules, you can in no situation ever, attack CI, unless they attacked you/foundation.
[Stop just claiming stuff like "common sense" just so you do not need to admit that the ruleset is just completely stupid]
There should be a entry added which allows you to kill players which are part of a group which is hostile to you if they are armed.
 

Okay so first, anyone who just says "use common sense" clearly has no idea what they are talking about, if its not a listed reason, it would be RDM, even if Staff normally ignore it due to the ruleset being kinda stupid.
And if you read 1.14, you will notice that infact there is nothing allowing you to kill CI, armed or unarmed, unless they harm foundation personnel or are trepassing (aka if they raided bassiclly).
These Combat rules are from a long time ago, and they do not fit at all.
With these rules, you can in no situation ever, attack CI, unless they attacked you/foundation.
[Stop just claiming stuff like "common sense" just so you do not need to admit that the ruleset is just completely stupid]
There should be a entry added which allows you to kill players which are part of a group which is hostile to you if they are armed.
 

Your ban was permitted by Server Managment, so good luck with that.
[Also how did you get unbanned in the first place, as I see no accepted unban appeal .........]

Your ban was permitted by Server Managment, so good luck with that.
[Also how did you get unbanned in the first place, as I see no accepted unban appeal .........]

Your ban was permitted by Server Managment, so good luck with that.
[Also how did you get unbanned in the first place, as I see no accepted unban appeal .........]

"no i wont list every single rule for no reason" maybe you should ...... since you currently are under word limit [bruh why did you not check that before posting ............]
 
But like otherwise, aslong as you are active [ can't rly judge since I ain't that active myself], sure why not +1

So I see more then a few issues with your app.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"as if your told to fight against GOC but you aren’t following the orders and get detained and demoted as you break out of cuffs (no guns pointed) and you got recuffed and got strapped on a crazy board and got strapped tight and you still go out of it or break out of cuffs is showing a lookse look of FailRP"
Firstly this is probably the most complicated example I have ever seen to try to explain FailRP, and depending if I understood everything right in there ....... FailRP may not even be applicable here.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"it will be punishable and will be giving a verbal warning as in further the player has done it more times it may result to heavily punishment or even permanent ban "
Firstly I do not understand why everyone wants to include punishments in the section about the rules, as I am going to gueese that 95% of the people who apply never saw the Punishment List.
Adding to that, saying that FailRP is generally punished by a verbal warn on first offense, is also just wrong.
Adding to that listing that it can go upto a perm ban is not helpful, since that applies to all rules essentially.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I will not go into the other 2 rules you listed, because they not much better.
Generally due to your writing, I would not trust you to be able to actually explain rules like, for example: Consquence RP, to a new player.
Nor can I confidently say you actually understood the rules.
-1 I do not think you are fit for Staff.

So I see more then a few issues with your app.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"as if your told to fight against GOC but you aren’t following the orders and get detained and demoted as you break out of cuffs (no guns pointed) and you got recuffed and got strapped on a crazy board and got strapped tight and you still go out of it or break out of cuffs is showing a lookse look of FailRP"
Firstly this is probably the most complicated example I have ever seen to try to explain FailRP, and depending if I understood everything right in there ....... FailRP may not even be applicable here.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"it will be punishable and will be giving a verbal warning as in further the player has done it more times it may result to heavily punishment or even permanent ban "
Firstly I do not understand why everyone wants to include punishments in the section about the rules, as I am going to gueese that 95% of the people who apply never saw the Punishment List.
Adding to that, saying that FailRP is generally punished by a verbal warn on first offense, is also just wrong.
Adding to that listing that it can go upto a perm ban is not helpful, since that applies to all rules essentially.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I will not go into the other 2 rules you listed, because they not much better.
Generally due to your writing, I would not trust you to be able to actually explain rules like, for example: Consquence RP, to a new player.
Nor can I confidently say you actually understood the rules.
-1 I do not think you are fit for Staff.

You were banned for MassRDM, I fail to see how that fits in with "the one time I did it back".
Clearly just Lying.

"no i wont list every single rule for no reason" maybe you should ...... since you currently are under word limit [bruh why did you not check that before posting ............]
 
But like otherwise, aslong as you are active [ can't rly judge since I ain't that active myself], sure why not +1

A few things about the Rules section:
"This can result in a ban or even a perma-ban if they kill over 9 people within a small window of time." ~ where did the number 9 come from, it isnt how we officall define it, and neither is the rough guideline we sometimes give tmods when to consider MRDM.

"Combat Baiting. This is when a player is trying to start a conflict for no RP reason." - Where did this even come from?. its not in our ruleset, [most cases which this would apply to, are covered by other rules like trolling]
Also you specificly pointed out Building rules .... but the 2 rules you listed .... are not directly related to building, but props.
Also why did you try to include Punishments on every rule, from reading them I can tell you clearly don't actually know the punishments, which is ofc fine since you aren't staff yet, but I fail to see your reasoning.
I would still give you a +1 as the app is fine, aslong as you respond to this in any way [so I know ya actually paying attention to what happens on your apps]

Denied
User has allready been punished.

There is certain stuff, you can certainally call "having fun", but I fail how spamming ear rape radius, or in the first clip having / allowing other people to have FailRP Names .... is fun.
If a staff member breaks certains rules which are specificly made to stop other players from being annoying (Radio) rules, I fail seeing how that is "having fun", someone even calling out "who played the horrible noises" means they are allready annoyed by it, and that would be a very good sign for a normal staff member to stop.
And in the first clip, how can having a failRP name be seen as having "fun"? The only way I see stuff like this being fun, is if you have fun by being a "rebell" and breaking the rules.
And while its not "abuse" in a tradtional sense, it is Breaking the Staff rules, and it is tierable.
Worst case Scenraio: Bango gets a Single Perm Tier [Which is the same as 2 Temp Tiers] , which at his rank means automatic removal from the Staff Team.
For the 3rd Part of your post, by technicallity it doesn't matter, being a hypocrite isn't disallowed, even if its not good behvaiour.

A: Lagging doesn't magicly turn your 1 click to over 40+ clicks
B: You even changed weapons midway throught spawning props, how does that work.
If you try to come up with a lie, atleast make it beliveable

A: Lagging doesn't magicly turn your 1 click to over 40+ clicks
B: You even changed weapons midway throught spawning props, how does that work.
If you try to come up with a lie, atleast make it beliveable

You are not getting unbanned if you tried to bypass your ban.

What we would need ideally would be actual Playermodels which are customizeable ( aka Bodygroups ), so you can uniquely identify people, for this to propperly work they would also need to be randomised on spawn.
Which would come at the cost of either Size [more files needed] or less unique models.
Also yes, you would see more RDM cases towards civs, but without context this means nothing, there are really not that many cases of RDM, so the staff team could more then handle this [most RDM cases seem to be MassRDM, which well this has no effect on].
The main issue really being, that since the Nametags have really limited range, you cannot uniquely identify people. Having the range of nametags makes sense, you wouldnt be able to identify a person from any distance just with your eye. This fails with scopes, as nothing compensates for the fact that you would be able to easier recognize a person from a larger distance.
So a propper way to actually fix this issue, would either be rethinking of how playermodels are used on the server, as in more generic playermodels, which can be customized and are so by default! Coming at the disadvantage of Less Intrestring/Unique Models or larger Server Content [Being very bad to gain new players].
Or Make it so that the Range of visable nametakes is realistic with a range where you could reasonable identify a person, and also compensates for scopes. This would be less ideal from an RP Sense, as would have stuff like [Description of XXXXX] again, but would be far more beginner friendly and potentialy eaisier to realize.
 
In my oppion, this just highlights an actual issue with how the server currently works regarding this, yes this change would make it even worse ......... but we could also just fix the issue itself, and try to have a way to be able to actually unique identify people you saw, and not just either give vague descriptions, or say their name, which then becomes metagaming.

His Whitelist for commander was removed by Norra at that time, which if you consider how often he played commander, is allready pretty big punishment,you are essentially removing something that may have been one of the few reasons he actually plays on the server.
Personally this is also the first time I seen roach have a breakdown like that, so I have no context about how often this happens/ how bad/etc.
And  you probably wont get warned for DTP or DTS because you were throwing around with insults.
What will get you warned/banned most likely is, if you actually personally attack people / try to bully them of the server.
Most people can shrug off random insults, while personal attacks / constant bullying is not as easily tolerable for many people.
 
Also, if a player actually reports DTP it will be treated more heavily.Not a single player reported roach, we stepped in before, but without anyone actually reporting it. Staff, espcially more expirenced once, will not really care if they get insulted,  and so may choose not to warn someone.
 
If you actually want to show roach is being consitantly toxic and mass DTPing, you should maybe show proof of him over and over doing it, not having a breakdown once.
You could very well use this video in part of your evidence, but if you want to show "constant" toxicity, you can't just include him having a one time mental breakdown.

His Whitelist for commander was removed by Norra at that time, which if you consider how often he played commander, is allready pretty big punishment,you are essentially removing something that may have been one of the few reasons he actually plays on the server.
Personally this is also the first time I seen roach have a breakdown like that, so I have no context about how often this happens/ how bad/etc.
And  you probably wont get warned for DTP or DTS because you were throwing around with insults.
What will get you warned/banned most likely is, if you actually personally attack people / try to bully them of the server.
Most people can shrug off random insults, while personal attacks / constant bullying is not as easily tolerable for many people.
 
Also, if a player actually reports DTP it will be treated more heavily.Not a single player reported roach, we stepped in before, but without anyone actually reporting it. Staff, espcially more expirenced once, will not really care if they get insulted,  and so may choose not to warn someone.
 
If you actually want to show roach is being consitantly toxic and mass DTPing, you should maybe show proof of him over and over doing it, not having a breakdown once.
You could very well use this video in part of your evidence, but if you want to show "constant" toxicity, you can't just include him having a one time mental breakdown.

His Whitelist for commander was removed by Norra at that time, which if you consider how often he played commander, is allready pretty big punishment,you are essentially removing something that may have been one of the few reasons he actually plays on the server.
Personally this is also the first time I seen roach have a breakdown like that, so I have no context about how often this happens/ how bad/etc.
And  you probably wont get warned for DTP or DTS because you were throwing around with insults.
What will get you warned/banned most likely is, if you actually personally attack people / try to bully them of the server.
Most people can shrug off random insults, while personal attacks / constant bullying is not as easily tolerable for many people.
 
Also, if a player actually reports DTP it will be treated more heavily.Not a single player reported roach, we stepped in before, but without anyone actually reporting it. Staff, espcially more expirenced once, will not really care if they get insulted,  and so may choose not to warn someone.
 
If you actually want to show roach is being consitantly toxic and mass DTPing, you should maybe show proof of him over and over doing it, not having a breakdown once.
You could very well use this video in part of your evidence, but if you want to show "constant" toxicity, you can't just include him having a one time mental breakdown.