Viktor Svetsken

Name: Viktor Svetsken
Tag needed for removal: The Staff Rank bound to me
Proof/Reason: I am resigning from the SCP-RP Staff Team, my resignation is being/has been announced. SCP SMT can confirm. All I would like is my PVIP back.

Name: Viktor Svetsken
Tag needed for removal: The Staff Rank bound to me
Proof/Reason: I am resigning from the SCP-RP Staff Team, my resignation is being/has been announced. SCP SMT can confirm. All I would like is my PVIP back.

I think I'm the one who banned you? I dunno, probably not. Either way.

Bruh, you were literally running around named "funny" using the flamer indiscriminately and hitting Foundation members while doing it (on purpose suggested by your movement and aim) 
This would make it Mass FailRP and just all round not being here to RP at all. That's probably why you got banned and why you will remain banned for a little longer. I'd give it about 2-3 more months before you can come back.
Consider your actions and learn from them because you won't be given another chance afterwards. Take some more time then get back to us.

Here's what I've got to say to defend myself in this case
1. You along with another (what I could only suppose was a friend) were in D-block shooting people. Watched you actually kill one without reason.
2. Not only were you by this person's side after doing so, you were by their side (presumably) while they killed 7 people out of the blue. Inside block and outside block (Foundation personnel)
3. The pictures you provided were of two different accounts. One who MRDM'd and one who killed one in block without reason but also sided with the person who committed MassRDM. There were other staff on at the time, you could have very well reported MRDM but instead over looked it as it was your friend. 
Sorry friend but when you tie yourself up in the rules, you tend to break them. Best to leave them be and abide by them. 
I respect your opinions and your values but your actions were not in line of the rules. You willingly allowed your friend to MRDM without reporting it and decided to join in which I was not allowing for the better health of the community.
If you have any questions, please ask more.
Side note: We kind of need your SteamID however we can always find out which one is you and the other being your friend.
Another note: NH2RP is for willingly avoiding RP and playing the server as a sandbox server rather than RP. Different from RDM. If you were the one who MRDM'd well then that sums it up.

Ace Rews
Remember getting into a few sits with you but you know your stuff. You have shown this to me a few times.
I do trust that you will make an excellent part of the team if given the chance. This however, is not my choice.
I would like to see how you work on the team. I believe you will uphold the rules quite well.
Until then
+1

Accepted
User's ban will be reduced down to 1-2 months.
User will be given another chance.

Denied
User's actions on the server were deemed unacceptable due to the violation of multiple rules and they cannot be trusted.
Appeal at a later time.

Denied
User's actions on the server were deemed unacceptable due to the violation of multiple rules and they cannot be trusted.
Appeal at a later time.

Denied
User's actions on the server were deemed unacceptable due to the violation of multiple rules and they cannot be trusted.
Appeal at a later time.

User was already banned permanently for another reason. Therein, this thread is unnecessary and will be locked soon.

NLR applies to Class-D, however the area being D-block (It's a very small portion of the map), NLR is instantly "removed" but doesn't exempt the user from NLR.

Hello @alo!
Since I'm the one who unfortunately banned you, I'll give you my reason as to why I banned you from the server.
It was to my understanding you killed the Class-Ds in the block without warning in text chat or voice chat by a few users. I checked logs for chat transcripts showing a warning of any type from you (as I was using your STEAMID to filter chat at the time) but nothing came up. I confronted the one who called the case and they said that you hadn't said anything in text or voice. 
The whole problem with these cases is that sometimes people say they gave a warning when there was nothing audible/visible to the ones who died in the scenario but something could have happened to make this not happen. (Poor connection to the server, incorrect input, etc etc.)
With all of that, you can see why it looked just a little odd and seemed like it was just another MRDM incident. You did seem like a pretty reasonable person so I thought it was tad off, however looks can be a bit off-putting. 
As of now, I am willing to see you through and have you unbanned as this may very well have been an error with connection, input or just a VERY big misunderstanding on both ends.
My apologies and I wish you a good day! 
-Viktor

User was already banned permanently for another reason. Therein, this thread is unnecessary and will be locked soon.

+1
Wouldn't see why not, you edited your app to exceed the word count which is what made me iffy at first.
Other than a small incident, never had any bad experiences with you in-game.
You seem fit for the team.
Best of luck! -Viktor

@Didde This is the applicant's warning list
 

Neutral/+1
While I have only just now started seeing you around on the server, I can't say that any of my interactions with you were negative.
You've good a good app here and I wouldn't see why you shouldn't be given a chance.
Best of luck! -Viktor

When your on Holiday yet still update tags. 
 
Locked. 

Personal Verdict: Neutral
Reasons:
This app just seems to have a little less to it compared to some others, however it has potential I personally have not seen you within the server but I do trust you understand the basics of 1048.  
Best of luck! - Viktor
 

+1 great roleplayer, trusted person and friend, fun to spend time with, he is also quite smart and ambitious, good for the job id say.

+1
competent
active
good rp
detailed app
(need more O5-2)

[BASIC INFORMATION] 
 
Your In-Game Name: Viktor Svetsken (Agent Baron while on duty as MTF)
 
Your Steam-ID: STEAM_0:1:242419537
 
Your Age: 18
 
Your In-Game Playtime: 2w 4d 5h 18m
 
Your amount of warnings (15 Warnings max): No warnings as of writing this (Don't plan on changing that)
 
Rate your roleplaying skills: Personally I would rate myself 8.5 to 9 out of 10. Other users may think differently but we shall see.
 
[BASIC QUESTIONS/IMPORTANT Questions]
 
 
What would you like your O5 Designation to be?: 
 
Why do you believe you should be part of the O5 Council and what can you bring to the role e.g (Pressure in extreme situations, making the tough decisions):
I believe that I should be a part of the O5 Council for the sole reason that I will deliver top of the line operational security and efficiency to the table. Personally I have had the experiences of leading and devising teams to reach a mutual objective in a short time with maximum efficiency without fail. I will ensure that the site runs at optimal levels with extreme measures to ensure everything stays in check. This includes Containment, Site personnel protocol enforcement, Conduct within the site and the overall security of it. I will also seek to go on the offensive when it comes to possible attackers of the Foundation. The Foundations security and secrets are of utmost importance and they are not to be compromised, therefore I will ensure that all defensive and offensive plays are made to perfection. I can bring many plays to the table in terms of absolute security and confidentiality to the Council, I must however be able to act on them directly as intended. I will of course run these plans over with fellow Council members, getting their input and ultimately making a decision on a plan of mine. I will listen to fellow Council members and their opinions. I wish to be a part of the Council to be able to bring my skill set in terms of team leadership and wits behind certain situations. I can handle myself extremely well under pressure and I can come to a reasonable decision when it comes to making even the toughest of decisions. It comes down to the most logical answer to the problem and the most efficient solution. My decision making can be spot on at most times and I will continue this into the Council without fail and with just as much effectiveness as of now.
 
How many O5 Council Members are their in the SCP universe that are known but not on record?:
Known in the SCP universe, there are O5s with designations ranging from 1-13. There is a shroud of mystery behind the elusive O5-13 however. In terms to the Council, O5-13 doesn't exist. O5-13 is used as a tie-breaker and used when there is a 50/50 vote between the council members. When the tie appears in a case, a cycle of Council members starting from 1 to 12 is used in every case. One member is chosen in a constant, looped order (1, then 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, etc.) to make another vote to break the tie within the total votes. Other than that, the rest are designated by a number (being 1-12) and some sort of designated codename ("Prestige", "Founder", etc.) all while remaining highly anonymous to those around them on site. 
 
Can you explain what an O5 does for the foundation and the site itself and why he himself differs from any other site Adminstration?:
The O5 provides operational integrity to the Site they are active on without fail and with absolute efficiency and secrecy. The O5 himself differs from all other Site Administration as they have total authority over the entirety of the Foundation and have access to means that no one else does. This includes: Site Lockdown, Ability to launch the nuke should a/multiple SCP(s) breach to the surface, authority to order certain things to be done within the facility (to a reasonable extent), etc. The access to resources is limitless to the O5 as long it is within reasonable limits to make use of them. With the resources at hand, they can bring a swift solution into sight should a problem arise unlike the other Site Administration, who don't have the means to access those types of resources. In all technicality, a site without the O5 being present is a dangerous place. A site without an acting O5 is not only potentially leaving the site without proper resources to deal with critical situations, it's leaving the site without someone to make the correct calls in certain situations. The point in having an O5 on site is so the site is maintained in terms of security and integrity. If we were to put myself into a reality where I was an acting O5 then we can run through a couple of situations. Let's say an SCP breaches, the first thing on my agenda is to initiate a Site Lockdown. After locking down the site, I would ask someone to Initiate Lockdown Procedure on Glass Gate. Afterwards, move to secure location in which the SCP can't access with my protection detail. In the event of a Massive Raid situation, I would order for local armed units to take care of the intruders. The scale of the intrusion can sometimes dictate the lockdown call. (In my personal opinion, a Raid Lockdown should be implemented when the confirmed raider count is 5+.) Move to a secure area with my protection detail and request constant updates on the situation all while ordering their arrest or termination if proven to be a raider. Without the O5, the potential for SCPs breaching to the surface or mass raids happening without any consequence to them is massive as other Site Administration don't have access to the resources that the O5 does. This is how the O5 differs from the rest.
 
Explain what makes you special:
I believe what makes me special is my impartiality and my decision making. I can make decisions with absolute logic and make them effectively without having a second thought if it comes to give off a positive result. My ability to know when something is good to make a play on and something isn't good to touch at all is known among a few. (Having played Site Administration in the past) I know what decisions must be made when it comes to certain situations and I will employ special tactics and protocols to enforce those decisions should they require such solution. I also feel that my leadership skill is known in times of need when there is a situation in need of someone to take control. I always try and take the initiative when those situations arise and I plan on doing so within the Council should I be accepted into it.
 
How do you initiate a nuke?:
In order to initiate a nuke, you must contact Hierarchy and explain to them the reason for your call to initiate the nuke. Hierarchy will then vote on the fact if your reason to launch the nuke is valid or invalid. In the case your reason is valid, the nuke will be launched. (This does not mean you are in the clear however) In the situation that the nuked is launched and Hierarchy find out that the reason was actually invalid, you can get in trouble for MRDM. This will result in you being kicked and blacklisted from O5.
 
What are the rules a O5 Council member has to follow?:
The rules the O5 must follow are simple:
1: Never risk your life under any circumstances
2: Never go near any SCP containment areas in the case that a breach happens
3: Do NOT go anywhere near D-Block and the ones who inhabit it (Class-D Personnel).
4: Have a valid reason for any course of action that you set in motion. It's not like the O5 to go around ordering pointless things like random terminations or launching the nuke just because a Class-D got on the surface
5: Always be prepared; Be ready to initiate lockdown in the case of a massive raid or in the case of an SCP breaching their containment. You must have a valid reason to do these actions however as stated as it can be frowned upon by the Council for using resources where unnecessary. 
 
Why would you like to role play as an O5?: 
 I would like to role play as the O5 to ensure the order of the Facility so there are no problems regarding the security of the Site as a whole. I wish to bring a leader upon the people so they have someone they can go to when they are looking for insight. I wish to help those among the site by protecting them and ensuring everything is secure.
Notes: My Site Administration time may be iffy at the time but I will state for the record that I have played my share of time on Site Administration in the past and understand the risk that comes with playing it. I will live up to the expectations that are set in front of me.

[BASIC INFORMATION] 
 
Your In-Game Name: Viktor Svetsken (Agent Baron while on duty as MTF)
 
Your Steam-ID: STEAM_0:1:242419537
 
Your Age: 18
 
Your In-Game Playtime: 2w 4d 5h 18m
 
Your amount of warnings (15 Warnings max): No warnings as of writing this (Don't plan on changing that)
 
Rate your roleplaying skills: Personally I would rate myself 8.5 to 9 out of 10. Other users may think differently but we shall see.
 
[BASIC QUESTIONS/IMPORTANT Questions]
 
 
What would you like your O5 Designation to be?: 
 
Why do you believe you should be part of the O5 Council and what can you bring to the role e.g (Pressure in extreme situations, making the tough decisions):
I believe that I should be a part of the O5 Council for the sole reason that I will deliver top of the line operational security and efficiency to the table. Personally I have had the experiences of leading and devising teams to reach a mutual objective in a short time with maximum efficiency without fail. I will ensure that the site runs at optimal levels with extreme measures to ensure everything stays in check. This includes Containment, Site personnel protocol enforcement, Conduct within the site and the overall security of it. I will also seek to go on the offensive when it comes to possible attackers of the Foundation. The Foundations security and secrets are of utmost importance and they are not to be compromised, therefore I will ensure that all defensive and offensive plays are made to perfection. I can bring many plays to the table in terms of absolute security and confidentiality to the Council, I must however be able to act on them directly as intended. I will of course run these plans over with fellow Council members, getting their input and ultimately making a decision on a plan of mine. I will listen to fellow Council members and their opinions. I wish to be a part of the Council to be able to bring my skill set in terms of team leadership and wits behind certain situations. I can handle myself extremely well under pressure and I can come to a reasonable decision when it comes to making even the toughest of decisions. It comes down to the most logical answer to the problem and the most efficient solution. My decision making can be spot on at most times and I will continue this into the Council without fail and with just as much effectiveness as of now.
 
How many O5 Council Members are their in the SCP universe that are known but not on record?:
Known in the SCP universe, there are O5s with designations ranging from 1-13. There is a shroud of mystery behind the elusive O5-13 however. In terms to the Council, O5-13 doesn't exist. O5-13 is used as a tie-breaker and used when there is a 50/50 vote between the council members. When the tie appears in a case, a cycle of Council members starting from 1 to 12 is used in every case. One member is chosen in a constant, looped order (1, then 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, etc.) to make another vote to break the tie within the total votes. Other than that, the rest are designated by a number (being 1-12) and some sort of designated codename ("Prestige", "Founder", etc.) all while remaining highly anonymous to those around them on site. 
 
Can you explain what an O5 does for the foundation and the site itself and why he himself differs from any other site Adminstration?:
The O5 provides operational integrity to the Site they are active on without fail and with absolute efficiency and secrecy. The O5 himself differs from all other Site Administration as they have total authority over the entirety of the Foundation and have access to means that no one else does. This includes: Site Lockdown, Ability to launch the nuke should a/multiple SCP(s) breach to the surface, authority to order certain things to be done within the facility (to a reasonable extent), etc. The access to resources is limitless to the O5 as long it is within reasonable limits to make use of them. With the resources at hand, they can bring a swift solution into sight should a problem arise unlike the other Site Administration, who don't have the means to access those types of resources. In all technicality, a site without the O5 being present is a dangerous place. A site without an acting O5 is not only potentially leaving the site without proper resources to deal with critical situations, it's leaving the site without someone to make the correct calls in certain situations. The point in having an O5 on site is so the site is maintained in terms of security and integrity. If we were to put myself into a reality where I was an acting O5 then we can run through a couple of situations. Let's say an SCP breaches, the first thing on my agenda is to initiate a Site Lockdown. After locking down the site, I would ask someone to Initiate Lockdown Procedure on Glass Gate. Afterwards, move to secure location in which the SCP can't access with my protection detail. In the event of a Massive Raid situation, I would order for local armed units to take care of the intruders. The scale of the intrusion can sometimes dictate the lockdown call. (In my personal opinion, a Raid Lockdown should be implemented when the confirmed raider count is 5+.) Move to a secure area with my protection detail and request constant updates on the situation all while ordering their arrest or termination if proven to be a raider. Without the O5, the potential for SCPs breaching to the surface or mass raids happening without any consequence to them is massive as other Site Administration don't have access to the resources that the O5 does. This is how the O5 differs from the rest.
 
Explain what makes you special:
I believe what makes me special is my impartiality and my decision making. I can make decisions with absolute logic and make them effectively without having a second thought if it comes to give off a positive result. My ability to know when something is good to make a play on and something isn't good to touch at all is known among a few. (Having played Site Administration in the past) I know what decisions must be made when it comes to certain situations and I will employ special tactics and protocols to enforce those decisions should they require such solution. I also feel that my leadership skill is known in times of need when there is a situation in need of someone to take control. I always try and take the initiative when those situations arise and I plan on doing so within the Council should I be accepted into it.
 
How do you initiate a nuke?:
In order to initiate a nuke, you must contact Hierarchy and explain to them the reason for your call to initiate the nuke. Hierarchy will then vote on the fact if your reason to launch the nuke is valid or invalid. In the case your reason is valid, the nuke will be launched. (This does not mean you are in the clear however) In the situation that the nuked is launched and Hierarchy find out that the reason was actually invalid, you can get in trouble for MRDM. This will result in you being kicked and blacklisted from O5.
 
What are the rules a O5 Council member has to follow?:
The rules the O5 must follow are simple:
1: Never risk your life under any circumstances
2: Never go near any SCP containment areas in the case that a breach happens
3: Do NOT go anywhere near D-Block and the ones who inhabit it (Class-D Personnel).
4: Have a valid reason for any course of action that you set in motion. It's not like the O5 to go around ordering pointless things like random terminations or launching the nuke just because a Class-D got on the surface
5: Always be prepared; Be ready to initiate lockdown in the case of a massive raid or in the case of an SCP breaching their containment. You must have a valid reason to do these actions however as stated as it can be frowned upon by the Council for using resources where unnecessary. 
 
Why would you like to role play as an O5?: 
 I would like to role play as the O5 to ensure the order of the Facility so there are no problems regarding the security of the Site as a whole. I wish to bring a leader upon the people so they have someone they can go to when they are looking for insight. I wish to help those among the site by protecting them and ensuring everything is secure.
Notes: My Site Administration time may be iffy at the time but I will state for the record that I have played my share of time on Site Administration in the past and understand the risk that comes with playing it. I will live up to the expectations that are set in front of me.

+1,
Really nice app.
Really good user.
I seen them online daily.
Not toxic at all and not power hungry.
 
Although he uses :tux: all the time which makes him stinky

Not a valid reason to kill Class-D while you are also playing as one. You use that on Security, not on your own. Also for the record, you killed 6.
 

Not a valid reason to kill Class-D while you are also playing as one. You use that on Security, not on your own. Also for the record, you killed 6.