Aleks

+1

1+
Well he deserves he mega chad
 

You know what is really cringe Rock

+1 was already battalion so should ace anything he has to do

+1 hes a great guy isnt as active as other people tho

+1 YES

+1 Made it into ARC what else is there to say

+1 its complety understandable and i do agree DU should be the one regiment to have this added becuase ngl claims mid events can be slow for reasons that most staff are fighting or doing something related to the event

+1 all has been said

+1
just yes
great guy
active
good event plan

+1
Hazel is active and is just a great guy
event seems fine nothing too special but its not bad either

+1 all has been said really above

+1 already was EP so knows his stuff

Solid event to say the least seems good +1

+1 seems really fun but the event is heavilly like the main story line as they want to take the Chancellor hostage to win the war and all

+1/Neutral
good event idea but only thing i have is that having all clones wait till all are dead is going to be boring for like CT 4numbers who just joined and have to wait for the high HP RC GM Battalion to die

+1 seems like a interesting event so good luck

+1
Just a lad honestly

+1 same as barry

+1
Been trying to get battalion for a while
always great in GM

What your suggestion is: Adding some form of vehicle to GM, allowing flanking to be a little faster than just using a standard Grappling Hook.
Script fodder/workshop link: A suggestion by the Pie himself: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2326966706&searchtext=
Another suggestion could be the AT-RT or Speeders.
Any additional information: With the recent addition of LFS to the server, it is needless to say that, we were all excited to try new things out, including myself. As Frisby said himself, he realistically brought a whole bag of toys upon the server and gave some new things to pretty much everyone.
However, one regiment that really missed out on this blessing was GM. 501st had got their new and improved replacement for the dropship, 74th had received a new medical speeder, GC had got the new AT-RTs even though they already have speeders to help scouting.
In addition to the AT-RTs, quite a few regiments have somehow ended up with them. GC, RC, Battalion and all ARC Troopers have access to them, which is one of the cons for GM now receiving them (as enough regiments already have them anyway). Hence why I've suggested some speeders or the steam workshop link above ^.
As shown in the link, the vehicle is a Infantry Support Platform, and as GM is a Frontline/Flanking & SUPPORT (wink wink) regiment, I believe these would be a fine addition to our collection. As also shown on steam, the addons are indeed LFS, making things a whole lot simpler (I think?). These would make our flanking a lot more efficient, quicker and more deadlier than before.
There have been more than enough time within a flank where we've had to turn back half way through due to 501st, RC and ARC all getting to the flanking point before us due to their dropship access, their Head Hunter access, etc. And now with the recent introduction of LFS, I feel as if GM has really drawn the shortest straw here.
Take this in whatever way you gentlemen (and ladies) would like, whether we're bitching or providing a very good argument here. However, in our opinion within GM, we do feel quite left out on having a regimental vehicle. Yes we have a very powerful Flame Throwers (501st have powerful shotguns) , yes we have access to useful Grappling Hooks (as do GC, ARC, RC & Battalion), but these are simply no match against other regiments who have far more superior vehicles to flaunt and advertise to new and eager CTs, therefore your normal reply of, "But you have Flame Throwers and Grappling Hooks!!!" is just not enough. Hence why we would very much appreciate regimental vehicles for ourselves.
Thank you very much for reading.

What your suggestion is: Adding some form of vehicle to GM, allowing flanking to be a little faster than just using a standard Grappling Hook.
Script fodder/workshop link: A suggestion by the Pie himself: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2326966706&searchtext=
Another suggestion could be the AT-RT or Speeders.
Any additional information: With the recent addition of LFS to the server, it is needless to say that, we were all excited to try new things out, including myself. As Frisby said himself, he realistically brought a whole bag of toys upon the server and gave some new things to pretty much everyone.
However, one regiment that really missed out on this blessing was GM. 501st had got their new and improved replacement for the dropship, 74th had received a new medical speeder, GC had got the new AT-RTs even though they already have speeders to help scouting.
In addition to the AT-RTs, quite a few regiments have somehow ended up with them. GC, RC, Battalion and all ARC Troopers have access to them, which is one of the cons for GM now receiving them (as enough regiments already have them anyway). Hence why I've suggested some speeders or the steam workshop link above ^.
As shown in the link, the vehicle is a Infantry Support Platform, and as GM is a Frontline/Flanking & SUPPORT (wink wink) regiment, I believe these would be a fine addition to our collection. As also shown on steam, the addons are indeed LFS, making things a whole lot simpler (I think?). These would make our flanking a lot more efficient, quicker and more deadlier than before.
There have been more than enough time within a flank where we've had to turn back half way through due to 501st, RC and ARC all getting to the flanking point before us due to their dropship access, their Head Hunter access, etc. And now with the recent introduction of LFS, I feel as if GM has really drawn the shortest straw here.
Take this in whatever way you gentlemen (and ladies) would like, whether we're bitching or providing a very good argument here. However, in our opinion within GM, we do feel quite left out on having a regimental vehicle. Yes we have a very powerful Flame Throwers (501st have powerful shotguns) , yes we have access to useful Grappling Hooks (as do GC, ARC, RC & Battalion), but these are simply no match against other regiments who have far more superior vehicles to flaunt and advertise to new and eager CTs, therefore your normal reply of, "But you have Flame Throwers and Grappling Hooks!!!" is just not enough. Hence why we would very much appreciate regimental vehicles for ourselves.
Thank you very much for reading.

+1 all has been said

Neutral
same as pingu and victor

Neutral
you are a good lad for the spot
but DU hierarchy cant keep changing this much